Baillon B, Salvia P, Feipel V, Rooze M
Laboratoire d'Anatomie Fonctionnelle et Laboratoire d'Anatomie et Embryologie, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Belgique.
Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot. 2006 Sep;92(5):464-72. doi: 10.1016/s0035-1040(06)75833-0.
Analysis of the correction or over-correction of high valgus and varus tibial osteotomies is generally limited to the frontal plane. Most likely however, the deformation observed radiographically in the frontal plane is simply a one-dimensional expression of a more complex three-dimensional deformation. This might be one of the causes for certain failures after surgery and recurrent problems which are difficult to solve. We proposed using 3D electrogoniometric to measure of the effect of a "dome" osteotomy on patellar and femoro-tibial kinematics and the changes in the moment arms of the knee muscles.
We used five lower limbs harvested from non-fixed cadavers. A "dome" osteotomy was stabilized by external fixation. Three-dimensional analysis of the femoro-tibial and femoro-patellar kinematics was performed using two electrogoniometers with six degrees of freedom. Changes in the lengths of the hamstrings and quadriceps was measured using four LVDT linear variable differential transformers. The muscles lever arms were measured with the tendon excursion method.
At 90 degrees flexion, varus osteotomy induced internal rotation while valgus osteotomy induced the opposite effect. Beyond 40 degrees flexion, there was a clear internal rotation of the patella for varus and neutral corrections. Valgus corrections however induced external rotation. The peak lever arm of the quadriceps increased with valgus, while the angle of the peak was higher for varus correction. Valgus appeared to increase the lever arm of the semitendinous.
Our study demonstrated that the effect of tibial osteotomy is not limited to the frontal plane. Tibial rotations are observed systematically for all corrections in the frontal plane. Varus correction tends to create internal rotation while valgus correction tends to have the opposite effect. Axial correction also affects patellar kinematics. Interanal rotation is induced by varus correction and external rotation by valgus correction. This patellar rotation could result from tibial rotations induced by the different corrections. The loss of the parallelism between the patellar crest and the trochlear groove could produce changes in femoropatellar surface contact and pressure, potentially leading to pain or cartilage degeneration. The maximal value of the quadriceps moment arm appears to increase with valgus. The efficacy of the quadriceps could thus be improved with valgus, potentially increasing extension force. Valgus increases the moment arm, improving limb flexion, while varus correction has the opposite effect. This could explain a loss in flexion amplitude in patients with varus or who underwent varus osteotomy. Tibial osteotomy is designed to correct the deviation solely in the frontal plane but also has effects in all three planes. Further 3D analyses of the morphology and physiology of the knee joint would be needed to better understand the physiological and pathological processes involved.
高外翻和内翻胫骨截骨术的矫正或过度矫正分析通常局限于额状面。然而,最有可能的是,在额状面影像学上观察到的变形仅仅是更复杂的三维变形的一维表现。这可能是手术后某些失败以及难以解决的复发问题的原因之一。我们建议使用三维电子测角仪来测量“穹顶”截骨术对髌股和股胫运动学的影响以及膝关节肌肉力臂的变化。
我们使用了从非固定尸体上获取的五条下肢。“穹顶”截骨术通过外固定进行稳定。使用两个具有六个自由度的电子测角仪对股胫和股髌运动学进行三维分析。使用四个线性可变差动变压器(LVDT)测量绳肌和股四头肌长度的变化。采用肌腱偏移法测量肌肉力臂。
在90度屈曲时,内翻截骨术导致内旋,而外翻截骨术则产生相反的效果。在屈曲超过40度时,内翻和中立矫正时髌骨明显内旋。然而,外翻矫正导致外旋。股四头肌的峰值力臂随外翻增加,而内翻矫正时峰值角度更高。外翻似乎增加了半腱肌的力臂。
我们的研究表明,胫骨截骨术的效果不限于额状面。在额状面的所有矫正中均系统地观察到胫骨旋转。内翻矫正倾向于产生内旋,而外翻矫正倾向于产生相反的效果。轴向矫正也会影响髌股运动学。内翻矫正导致内旋,外翻矫正导致外旋。这种髌骨旋转可能是由不同矫正引起的胫骨旋转所致。髌嵴与滑车沟之间平行度的丧失可能会导致髌股表面接触和压力的变化,潜在地导致疼痛或软骨退变。股四头肌力臂的最大值似乎随外翻增加。因此,外翻可能会提高股四头肌的效能,潜在地增加伸展力。外翻增加力臂,改善肢体屈曲,而内翻矫正则产生相反的效果。这可以解释内翻患者或接受内翻截骨术患者屈曲幅度的丧失。胫骨截骨术旨在仅在额状面矫正畸形,但在所有三个平面上均有影响。需要对膝关节的形态学和生理学进行进一步的三维分析,以更好地理解所涉及的生理和病理过程。