Gaab Nadine, Gabrieli John D E, Glover Gary H
Department of Psychology, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA.
Hum Brain Mapp. 2007 Aug;28(8):721-32. doi: 10.1002/hbm.20299.
Several studies reported decreased signal intensities within auditory areas for experimental designs employing continuous scanner background noise (SBN) in comparison to designs with less or no SBN. This study examined the source for this SBN-induced masking effect of the blood oxygenation level-dependent (BOLD) response by directly comparing two experimental sessions with the same auditory stimulation, which was presented either with or without recorded scanner background noise (RecSBN). Ten subjects listened to a series of four one-syllable words and had to decide whether two of the words were identical. The words were either presented with a silent background or with added RecSBN. This was then contrasted with either silence or RecSBN. A sparse temporal sampling method was used in both sessions, which enabled us to directly assess the influence of RecSBN without varying scanning parameters, acquisition quantities, or auditory stimulations. Our results suggest that previously reported SBN-induced masking of the BOLD response in experimental designs with SBN might be caused by an interaction between increased baseline levels and nonlinearity effects within auditory cortices. Adding SBN to an experimental condition does not enhance signal intensities to the same degree that SBN does when presented with a silent background, and therefore contrasting an experimental and baseline condition that both have SBN may lead to signal decreases. In addition, our study shows this effect is greatest in Heschl's gyrus, but can also be observed in higher-order auditory areas.
几项研究报告称,与使用较少或不使用扫描仪背景噪声(SBN)的实验设计相比,在采用连续扫描仪背景噪声(SBN)的实验设计中,听觉区域内的信号强度降低。本研究通过直接比较两个具有相同听觉刺激的实验环节来探究这种SBN诱导的血氧水平依赖(BOLD)反应掩蔽效应的来源,这两个环节中听觉刺激分别在有或没有录制的扫描仪背景噪声(RecSBN)的情况下呈现。十名受试者听了一系列四个单音节单词,并必须判断其中两个单词是否相同。单词要么在安静背景下呈现,要么添加RecSBN后呈现。然后将其与安静或RecSBN进行对比。两个环节均采用了稀疏时间采样方法,这使我们能够在不改变扫描参数、采集量或听觉刺激的情况下直接评估RecSBN的影响。我们的结果表明,先前报道的在具有SBN的实验设计中SBN诱导的BOLD反应掩蔽可能是由听觉皮层内基线水平升高和非线性效应之间的相互作用引起的。在实验条件中添加SBN并不会像在安静背景下呈现SBN时那样同等程度地增强信号强度,因此对比两个都有SBN的实验条件和基线条件可能会导致信号降低。此外,我们的研究表明这种效应在颞横回中最为明显,但在高阶听觉区域也能观察到。