Ellis Alicia M, Lounibos L Philip, Holyoak Marcel
Department of Biological Sciences, Dartmouth College, Hanover, New Hampshire 03766, USA.
Ecology. 2006 Oct;87(10):2582-90. doi: 10.1890/0012-9658(2006)87[2582:etlmdo]2.0.co;2.
Four different conceptual models of metacommunities have been proposed, termed "patch dynamics," "species sorting", "mass effect", and "neutral". These models simplify thinking about metacommunities and improve our understanding of the role of spatial dynamics both in structuring communities and in determining local and regional diversity. We tested whether mosquito communities inhabiting water-filled tree holes in southeastern Florida, U.S.A., displayed any of the characteristics and dynamics predicted by the four models. The densities of the five most common species in 3-8 tree holes were monitored every two weeks during 1978-2003. We tested relationships between habitat variables and species densities, spatial synchrony, the presence of life history trade-offs, and species turnover. Dynamics showed strong elements of species sorting, but with considerable turnover, as predicted by the patch dynamics model. Consistent with patch dynamics, there was substantial asynchrony in dynamics for different tree holes, substantial species turnover in space and time, and an occupancy/colonization trade-off. Substantial correlations of density and occupancy with tree hole volume were consistent with the species-sorting model, but unlike this model, species did not have permanent refuges. No evidence of mass effects was found, and correlations between habitat variables and dynamics were inconsistent with neutral models. Our results did not match a single model and therefore caution against overly simplifying metacommunity dynamics by using one dynamical characteristic to select a particular metacommunity perspective.
已经提出了四种不同的集合群落概念模型,分别称为“斑块动态”“物种分选”“质量效应”和“中性”。这些模型简化了对集合群落的思考,并增进了我们对空间动态在构建群落以及决定局部和区域多样性方面所起作用的理解。我们测试了栖息在美国佛罗里达州东南部充满水的树洞中的蚊子群落是否表现出这四种模型所预测的任何特征和动态。在1978年至2003年期间,每两周监测一次3至8个树洞中五种最常见物种的密度。我们测试了栖息地变量与物种密度、空间同步性、生活史权衡的存在以及物种更替之间的关系。动态变化显示出物种分选的强烈元素,但正如斑块动态模型所预测的那样,存在相当大的更替。与斑块动态一致的是,不同树洞的动态变化存在很大的异步性,在空间和时间上有大量的物种更替,以及占据/定殖权衡。密度和占据与树洞体积之间的显著相关性与物种分选模型一致,但与该模型不同的是,物种没有永久避难所。未发现质量效应的证据,并且栖息地变量与动态变化之间的相关性与中性模型不一致。我们的结果与单一模型不匹配,因此要警惕通过使用一种动态特征来选择特定的集合群落观点而过度简化集合群落动态。