Demir Erhan, O'Dey Dan Mon, Pallua Norbert
Department of Plastic and Hand Surgery, Burn Center, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany.
J Burn Care Res. 2006 Nov-Dec;27(6):895-900. doi: 10.1097/01.BCR.0000245650.67130.5C.
The purpose of this report is to increase awareness of intraoperative burns during standard procedures, to discuss their possible causes and warning signs and to provide recommendations for prevention and procedures to follow after their occurrence. A total of 19 patients associated with intraoperative burn accidents were treated surgically and analyzed after a mean follow-up of 5 +/- 3.5 months. Review included retrospective patient chart analysis, clinical examination, and technical device and equipment testing. A total of 15 patients recently underwent cardiac surgery, and 4 pediatric patients recovered after standard surgical procedures. A total of 15 patients had superficial and 4 presented with deep dermal or full-thickness burns. The average injured TBSA was 2.1 +/- 1% (range, 0.5-4%). Delay between primary surgery and consultation of plastic surgeons was 4.5 +/- 3.4 days. A total of 44% required surgery, including débridment, skin grafting or musculocutaneous gluteus maximus flaps, and the remaining patients were treated conservatively. Successful durable soft-tissue coverage of the burn region was achieved in 18 patients, and 1 patient died after a course of pneumonia. Technical analysis demonstrated one malfunctioning electrosurgical device, one incorrect positioned neutral electrode, three incidents occurred after moisture under the negative electrode, eight burns occurred during surgery while fluid or blood created alternate current pathways, five accidents were chemical burns after skin preparation with Betadine solution, and in one case, the cause was not clear. The surgical team should pay more attention to the probability of burns during surgery. Early patient examination and immediate involvement of plastic and burn surgeons may prevent further complications or ease handling after the occurrence.
本报告的目的是提高对标准手术过程中术中烧伤的认识,讨论其可能的原因和警示信号,并提供预防建议以及烧伤发生后的应对措施。共有19例与术中烧伤事故相关的患者接受了手术治疗,并在平均随访5±3.5个月后进行了分析。回顾包括对患者病历的回顾性分析、临床检查以及技术设备测试。共有15例患者近期接受了心脏手术,4例儿科患者在标准外科手术后康复。共有15例患者为浅度烧伤,4例为深度真皮或全层烧伤。平均受伤的体表面积为2.1±1%(范围为0.5 - 4%)。初次手术与整形外科医生会诊之间的延迟为4.5±3.4天。共有44%的患者需要手术,包括清创、植皮或臀大肌肌皮瓣移植,其余患者接受保守治疗。18例患者成功实现了对烧伤区域的持久软组织覆盖,1例患者在患肺炎后死亡。技术分析显示有一台电外科设备故障,一个中性电极位置不正确,3起事故发生在负极下有水分之后,8起烧伤发生在手术期间液体或血液形成交流通路时,5起事故是在用碘伏溶液进行皮肤准备后发生的化学烧伤,还有1例原因不明。手术团队应更加关注手术期间发生烧伤的可能性。早期对患者进行检查并让整形外科和烧伤科医生立即介入,可能会预防进一步的并发症或在烧伤发生后便于处理。