Jacobs Jesse V, Horak Fay B
Neurological Sciences Institute, Oregon Health and Science University, 505 NW 185th Avenue, Beaverton, OR, 97006-3499, USA.
Exp Brain Res. 2007 May;179(1):29-42. doi: 10.1007/s00221-006-0763-5. Epub 2006 Nov 8.
Previous research on human balance recovery suggests that, prior to an externally triggered postural perturbation, healthy subjects can pre-select their postural response based on the environmental context, but it is unclear whether this pre-selection includes the selection of a stepping leg when performing compensatory steps. We sought to determine how pre-selecting a stepping limb affects the compensatory steps and stability of young, healthy subjects when responding to postural perturbations. Nine healthy subjects (24-37 years of age) stepped in response to backward translations of a platform under their feet when, prior to the perturbations, the subjects either knew whether they were to step with their left or right leg to a visual target (the Predictable condition) or did not know whether to step with their left or right leg until one of two targets appeared at perturbation onset (the Unpredictable condition). The Unpredictable condition also included randomly inserted trials of toes-up rotations and backward translations without targets (catch trials). The results showed that, in the Predictable condition, the subjects consistently exhibited one anticipatory postural adjustment (APA; a lateral weight shift toward the stance limb) before stepping accurately to the target with the correct leg. In the Unpredictable condition, the subjects either (1) exhibited multiple APAs, late step onsets, and forward center-of-mass (CoM) displacements that were farther beyond their base of support, or (2) exhibited an early step with only one APA and kept their CoM closer to the base of support, but also stepped more often with the incorrect leg. Thus, when the subjects had to select a stepping leg at perturbation onset, they either became more unstable and used multiple APAs to delay stepping in order to provide enough time to select the correct stepping leg, or they stepped earlier to remain stable but often stepped with the incorrect leg. In addition, responses to catch trials in the Unpredictable condition included distorted step placements that resembled steps to anticipated targets, despite allowing the subjects to step with a leg of their choice and to a location of their choice. Lastly, the subjects' voluntary stepping latencies to visual targets presented without perturbations were twice as long as their stepping latencies to the backward platform translations. Therefore, healthy subjects appear to pre-select their stepping limb, even when the perturbation characteristics are unpredictable, because relying on visual input provided at perturbation onset requires a delayed response that leads to greater instability.
先前关于人体平衡恢复的研究表明,在外部触发的姿势扰动之前,健康受试者可以根据环境背景预先选择他们的姿势反应,但尚不清楚这种预先选择在执行补偿性步幅时是否包括对步幅腿的选择。我们试图确定预先选择一个步幅肢体如何影响年轻健康受试者在应对姿势扰动时的补偿性步幅和稳定性。九名健康受试者(年龄在24至37岁之间)在脚下平台向后平移时做出步幅反应,在扰动之前,受试者要么知道他们要用左腿还是右腿迈向视觉目标(可预测条件),要么直到扰动开始时两个目标之一出现才知道要用左腿还是右腿(不可预测条件)。不可预测条件还包括随机插入的无目标的脚尖向上旋转和向后平移试验(捕捉试验)。结果表明,在可预测条件下,受试者在准确地用正确的腿迈向目标之前,始终表现出一种预期姿势调整(APA;向支撑肢体的侧向重量转移)。在不可预测条件下,受试者要么(1)表现出多次APA、步幅起始延迟以及质心(CoM)向前位移,且位移超出其支撑面更远,要么(2)仅表现出一次APA就提前步幅,并且使他们的CoM更靠近支撑面,但也更频繁地用错误的腿步幅。因此,当受试者必须在扰动开始时选择一个步幅腿时,他们要么变得更加不稳定并使用多次APA来延迟步幅,以便有足够的时间选择正确的步幅腿,要么提前步幅以保持稳定,但经常用错误的腿步幅。此外,在不可预测条件下对捕捉试验的反应包括扭曲的步幅位置,类似于迈向预期目标的步幅,尽管允许受试者用他们选择的腿并迈向他们选择的位置。最后,受试者对无扰动呈现的视觉目标的自愿步幅潜伏期是他们对向后平台平移的步幅潜伏期的两倍。因此,即使扰动特征不可预测,健康受试者似乎也会预先选择他们的步幅肢体,因为依赖于扰动开始时提供的视觉输入需要延迟反应,这会导致更大的不稳定性。