Liu Liwang, Zhao Rubing, Bai Yan, Stanish Lee F, Evans James E, Sanderson Michael J, Bonventre Joseph V, Rittenhouse Ann R
Program in Neuroscience and Department of Physiology, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, Massachusetts 01655, USA.
J Neurosci. 2006 Nov 8;26(45):11588-98. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2102-06.2006.
Ion channels reside in a sea of phospholipids. During normal fluctuations in membrane potential and periods of modulation, lipids that directly associate with channel proteins influence gating by incompletely understood mechanisms. In one model, M(1)-muscarinic receptors (M(1)Rs) may inhibit both Ca(2+) (L- and N-) and K(+) (M-) currents by losing a putative interaction between channels and phosphatidylinositol-4,5-bisphosphate (PIP(2)). However, we found previously that M(1)R inhibition of N-current in superior cervical ganglion (SCG) neurons requires loss of PIP(2) and generation of a free fatty acid, probably arachidonic acid (AA) by phospholipase A(2) (PLA(2)). It is not known whether PLA(2) activity and AA also participate in L- and M-current modulation in SCG neurons. To test whether PLA(2) plays a similar role in M(1)R inhibition of L- and M-currents, we used several experimental approaches and found unanticipated divergent signaling. First, blocking resynthesis of PIP(2) minimized M-current recovery from inhibition, whereas L-current recovered normally. Second, L-current inhibition required group IVa PLA(2) [cytoplasmic PLA(2) (cPLA(2))], whereas M-current did not. Western blot and imaging studies confirmed acute activation of cPLA(2) by muscarinic stimulation. Third, in type IIa PLA(2) secreted (sPLA(2))/cPLA(2)(-/-) double-knock-out SCG neurons, muscarinic inhibition of L-current decreased. In contrast, M-current inhibition remained unaffected but recovery was impaired. Our results indicate that L-current is inhibited by a pathway previously shown to control M-current over-recovery after washout of muscarinic agonist. Our findings support a model of M(1)R-meditated channel modulation that broadens rather than restricts the roles of phospholipids and fatty acids in regulating ion channel activity.
离子通道存在于磷脂的海洋中。在膜电位的正常波动和调节期间,与通道蛋白直接相关的脂质通过尚未完全理解的机制影响门控。在一个模型中,M(1)-毒蕈碱受体(M(1)Rs)可能通过失去通道与磷脂酰肌醇-4,5-二磷酸(PIP(2))之间的假定相互作用来抑制Ca(2+)(L型和N型)和K(+)(M型)电流。然而,我们之前发现,M(1)R对颈上神经节(SCG)神经元中N电流的抑制需要PIP(2)的丧失和游离脂肪酸(可能是花生四烯酸(AA))由磷脂酶A(2)(PLA(2))产生。尚不清楚PLA(2)活性和AA是否也参与SCG神经元中L型和M型电流的调节。为了测试PLA(2)在M(1)R对L型和M型电流的抑制中是否起类似作用,我们使用了几种实验方法,发现了意想不到的不同信号传导。首先,阻断PIP(2)的重新合成可最大程度地减少M电流从抑制中恢复,而L电流则正常恢复。其次,L电流抑制需要IVa组PLA(2)[细胞质PLA(2)(cPLA(2))],而M电流则不需要。蛋白质印迹和成像研究证实了毒蕈碱刺激可急性激活cPLA(2)。第三,在IIa型PLA(2)[分泌型(sPLA(2))](-/-)/ cPLA(2)(-/-)双敲除SCG神经元中,毒蕈碱对L电流的抑制作用降低。相反,M电流抑制不受影响,但恢复受损。我们的结果表明,L电流受到一条先前显示可控制毒蕈碱激动剂洗脱后M电流过度恢复的途径的抑制。我们的发现支持了一种M(1)R介导的通道调节模型,该模型拓宽而不是限制了磷脂和脂肪酸在调节离子通道活性中的作用。