Suppr超能文献

两位19世纪法医精神病学家对精神错乱的不同观点。

The differing views on insanity of two nineteenth century forensic psychiatrists.

作者信息

Spiegel Allen D, Kavaler Florence

出版信息

J Community Health. 2006 Oct;31(5):430-51. doi: 10.1007/s10900-006-9017-5.

Abstract

Dr. Charles H. Nichols and Dr. John P. Gray were the two foremost forensic psychiatrists in the latter half of the nineteenth century in the U.S. However, their rationales differed dramatically. They were involved in four notable murder trials where insanity issues arose: one was a trial for the murderer of a Union officer during the Civil War; in another, a conspirator was tried for the assassination of President Abraham Lincoln; in the third, a temporary insanity plea was supported by a medical expert for the first time in a U.S. courtroom; and the fourth was the trial of the assassin of President James A. Garfield. Pointedly, their differing viewpoints still remain controversial today.

摘要

查尔斯·H·尼科尔斯博士和约翰·P·格雷博士是19世纪后半叶美国两位最重要的法医精神病学家。然而,他们的理论依据却大相径庭。他们参与了四起涉及精神错乱问题的著名谋杀案审判:一起是内战期间一名联邦军官谋杀案的审判;另一起是一名阴谋者因暗杀亚伯拉罕·林肯总统而受审;第三起是在美国法庭上,一名医学专家首次支持临时精神错乱抗辩;第四起是詹姆斯·A·加菲尔德总统刺客的审判。值得注意的是,他们不同的观点至今仍存在争议。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验