Suppr超能文献

电视辅助胸腔镜手术后硬膜外镇痛的疗效:一项随机对照研究。

The efficacy of epidural analgesia after video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery: a randomized control study.

作者信息

Yoshioka Masakazu, Mori Takeshi, Kobayashi Hironori, Iwatani Kazunori, Yoshimoto Kentaro, Terasaki Hidenori, Nomori Hiroaki

机构信息

Department of Thoracic Surgery, Graduate School of Medical and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, Japan.

出版信息

Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2006 Oct;12(5):313-8.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) is known to reduce the severity of pain after surgery. However, it has not yet been established whether epidural anesthesia/analgesia (EA) is necessary after VATS. We therefore conducted a randomized control study to examine whether or not EA is necessary for pain control after VATS.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Forty-six patients undergoing VATS were randomly allocated to one of 2 groups: 24 who were given EA after the procedure (EA group) and 22 who were not (NEA group). Patients in the EA group received a continuous infusion of fentanyl and bupivacaine via an epidural catheter for 2 days after VATS. The degree of postoperative pain was assessed on the total dose of additional analgesics administered, a visual analog scale (VAS), a verbal pain score at rest (VPS-R) and on movement (VPS-M), from the day of surgery to the 2nd postoperative day (2 POD).

RESULTS

Additional use of rectal diclofenac sodium and intramuscular pentazocine was more frequent in the NEA group than in the EA group (p<0.05). The VAS, VPS-R, and VPS-M scores were significantly lower in the EA group than in the NEA group at 0 POD, from 0 to 1 POD, and from 0 to 2 POD, respectively (p<0.0001-0.05). Stepwise regression analysis revealed that EA was a significant independent variable of VPS-R and VPS-M from 0 to 1 POD (p<0.05). However, the incidence of nausea/vomiting in the EA group was 29%, which was more frequent than in the NEA group (5%) (p<0.05).

CONCLUSION

While EA causes nausea/vomiting in some patients, it is effective for pain control until 1 POD after VATS, especially for pain on movements.

摘要

目的

电视辅助胸腔镜手术(VATS)已知可减轻术后疼痛的严重程度。然而,VATS术后是否需要硬膜外麻醉/镇痛(EA)尚未确定。因此,我们进行了一项随机对照研究,以检验VATS术后控制疼痛是否需要EA。

患者与方法

46例行VATS的患者被随机分为2组:24例术后接受EA的患者(EA组)和22例未接受EA的患者(非EA组)。EA组患者在VATS术后通过硬膜外导管持续输注芬太尼和布比卡因2天。从手术当天至术后第2天(POD),根据额外使用的镇痛药物总剂量、视觉模拟评分(VAS)、静息时语言疼痛评分(VPS-R)和活动时语言疼痛评分(VPS-M)评估术后疼痛程度。

结果

非EA组比EA组更频繁地额外使用直肠双氯芬酸钠和肌肉注射喷他佐辛(p<0.05)。在0 POD、0至1 POD以及0至2 POD时,EA组的VAS、VPS-R和VPS-M评分分别显著低于非EA组(p<0.0001 - 0.05)。逐步回归分析显示,在0至1 POD时,EA是VPS-R和VPS-M的显著独立变量(p<0.05)。然而,EA组恶心/呕吐的发生率为29%,高于非EA组(5%)(p<0.05)。

结论

虽然EA在一些患者中会引起恶心/呕吐,但它对VATS术后至1 POD的疼痛控制有效,尤其是对活动时的疼痛。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验