Suppr超能文献

在小儿白内障手术中,与静脉注射芬太尼相比,球后阻滞用于围手术期镇痛的效果比较

Subtenon block compared to intravenous fentanyl for perioperative analgesia in pediatric cataract surgery.

作者信息

Ghai Babita, Ram Jagat, Makkar Jeetinder Kaur, Wig Jyotsna, Kaushik Sushmita

机构信息

Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.

出版信息

Anesth Analg. 2009 Apr;108(4):1132-8. doi: 10.1213/ane.0b013e318198a3fd.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

General anesthesia with opioids provides good operative conditions for ocular surgery in children; however, postoperative pain management remains a significant problem. Regional anesthesia is commonly used as an adjunct to general anesthesia in children. We compared the efficacy and safety of subtenon block (SB) versus IV fentanyl for perioperative analgesia in pediatric cataract surgery. We hypothesized that perioperative analgesia using SB may reduce the requirement of postoperative rescue analgesia compared with fentanyl.

METHODS

This was a prospective, randomized, controlled, double-blind trial. One hundred fourteen ASA I and II children (6 mo-6 yr) undergoing elective cataract surgery in one eye under general anesthesia were studied. Children were randomly allocated to one of the two groups, i.e., Group SB (n = 58) or Group F (n = 56) after securing the airway. Children in Group SB received SB with 0.06-0.08 mL/kg of 2% lidocaine and 0.5% bupivacaine (50:50) mixture and simultaneous 0.2 mL/kg normal saline IV, whereas children in Group F received 1 microg/kg (0.2 mL/kg of 5 microg/kg) of fentanyl IV and simultaneous subtenon injection with normal saline (0.06-0.08 mL/kg). Surgery started after 5 min of study drug administration. Postoperative assessment for pain, sedation, and nausea/vomiting was done at 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, and 24 h. The primary outcome was number of patients requiring rescue analgesia during the 24-h study period. Secondary outcomes assessed were pain and sedation scores, time to first rescue analgesia, incidence of occulocardiac reflex, and nausea/vomiting.

RESULTS

The number of patients requiring rescue analgesia during the 24 h was significantly less in Group SB (n = 17/58, 29.3%) compared with Group F (n = 39/56, 69.6%, P < 0.001). The postoperative pain scores were statistically lower in Group SB at all time intervals. The median (range) time to first analgesic requirement was significantly prolonged in Group SB (9 [corrected] [2-13] vs 4 [0.5-8.5] h in Group F) (P < 0.001). Sedation scores at (1/2) h were comparable, after which significantly more children were anxious or crying in Group F compared with Group SB in which more children were calm, sitting, or lying with eyes open and relaxed (P < 0.05). A significantly higher incidence of oculocardiac reflex was recorded in Group F versus Group SB (P = 0.019). No complication related to SB was noticed.

CONCLUSIONS

SB is a safe and superior alternative to IV fentanyl for perioperative analgesia in pediatric cataract surgery.

摘要

背景

使用阿片类药物的全身麻醉可为儿童眼科手术提供良好的手术条件;然而,术后疼痛管理仍然是一个重大问题。区域麻醉常用于儿童全身麻醉的辅助麻醉。我们比较了球后阻滞(SB)与静脉注射芬太尼用于小儿白内障手术围手术期镇痛的疗效和安全性。我们假设与芬太尼相比,使用SB进行围手术期镇痛可能会减少术后补救性镇痛的需求。

方法

这是一项前瞻性、随机、对照、双盲试验。研究了114例年龄在6个月至6岁之间、接受全身麻醉下择期单眼白内障手术的美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)I级和II级儿童。在确保气道安全后,将儿童随机分配到两组中的一组,即SB组(n = 58)或F组(n = 56)。SB组儿童接受0.06 - 0.08 mL/kg的2%利多卡因和0.5%布比卡因(50:50)混合液进行球后阻滞,并同时静脉注射0.2 mL/kg生理盐水,而F组儿童接受1 μg/kg(0.2 mL/kg的5 μg/kg)芬太尼静脉注射,并同时球后注射生理盐水(0.06 - 0.08 mL/kg)。在给予研究药物5分钟后开始手术。在术后0.5、1、2、3、4和24小时对疼痛、镇静和恶心/呕吐进行评估。主要结局是在24小时研究期间需要补救性镇痛的患者数量。评估的次要结局包括疼痛和镇静评分、首次补救性镇痛的时间、眼心反射的发生率以及恶心/呕吐。

结果

与F组(n = 39/56,69.6%)相比,SB组在24小时内需要补救性镇痛的患者数量显著更少(n = 17/58,29.3%,P < 0.001)。在所有时间间隔,SB组的术后疼痛评分在统计学上更低。SB组首次镇痛需求的中位(范围)时间显著延长(9 [校正后] [2 - 13]小时,而F组为4 [0.5 - 8.5]小时)(P < 0.001)。在(1/2)小时时镇静评分相当,此后F组中焦虑或哭闹的儿童明显多于SB组,SB组中更多儿童安静、坐着或躺着,眼睛睁开且放松(P < 0.05)。F组记录到的眼心反射发生率显著高于SB组(P = 0.019)。未发现与球后阻滞相关的并发症。

结论

在小儿白内障手术围手术期镇痛方面,球后阻滞是静脉注射芬太尼的一种安全且更优的替代方法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验