Wittkowsky Ann K, Nutescu Edith A, Blackburn Juan, Mullins Jennifer, Hardman Jennifer, Mitchell Jessica, Vats Vikrant
School of Pharmacy, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Chest. 2006 Nov;130(5):1385-9. doi: 10.1378/chest.130.5.1385.
Anticoagulation management by a dedicated anticoagulation clinic improves patient outcomes compared to routine medical care. Telephone-based anticoagulation management has been described but has not been compared to management with traditional office-based visits. The objective of this study was to compare warfarin-related monitoring outcomes, clinical end points, and the use of health-care resources as a result of warfarin-related complications in anticoagulation clinic patients whose management was conducted by telephone or in-office-based visits.
Two university-affiliated anticoagulation clinics in Seattle, WA, and Chicago, IL.
A retrospective, observational cohort design was used to investigate anticoagulation clinic patients who were managed by telephone encounters compared to those managed during face-to-face in-office encounters.
A total of 234 patients were evaluated; 117 patients managed by telephone were compared to 117 patients managed in office-based clinic visits. Monitoring outcomes (ie, time in therapeutic range and clinic visits per patient-year) were similar between groups. Differences in major bleeding (5.67% vs 5.62% per patient-year, respectively) and thromboembolic events (1.42% vs 2.81% per patient-year, respectively) between telephone-managed and face-to-face-managed patients did not reach statistical significance. The same was true for differences in the frequency of emergency department visits and hospital admissions to manage complications of warfarin therapy.
Telephone-based management of oral anticoagulation through a pharmacist-staffed anticoagulation clinic yielded clinical outcomes that were at least as favorable as those associated with traditional office-based visits. Telephone follow-up can be successfully used to manage warfarin therapy in patients who are unable to present in person to an anticoagulation clinic.
与常规医疗护理相比,由专门的抗凝门诊进行抗凝管理可改善患者预后。基于电话的抗凝管理已有相关描述,但尚未与传统的门诊就诊管理进行比较。本研究的目的是比较在通过电话或门诊就诊进行管理的抗凝门诊患者中,与华法林相关的监测结果、临床终点以及因华法林相关并发症而使用的医疗资源。
华盛顿州西雅图市和伊利诺伊州芝加哥市的两家大学附属医院抗凝门诊。
采用回顾性观察队列设计,调查通过电话问诊管理的抗凝门诊患者与面对面门诊问诊管理的患者。
共评估了234例患者;将117例通过电话管理的患者与117例在门诊就诊管理的患者进行比较。两组间的监测结果(即治疗范围内的时间和每位患者每年的门诊就诊次数)相似。电话管理患者与面对面管理患者之间的大出血(分别为每位患者每年5.67%和5.62%)和血栓栓塞事件(分别为每位患者每年1.42%和2.81%)差异未达到统计学意义。在因华法林治疗并发症而进行的急诊科就诊频率和住院频率方面的差异也是如此。
通过配备药剂师的抗凝门诊进行基于电话的口服抗凝管理所产生的临床结果至少与传统门诊就诊管理的结果一样良好。电话随访可成功用于管理无法亲自前往抗凝门诊的患者的华法林治疗。