Garner Matthew, Mogg Karin, Bradley Brendan P
Division of Clinical Neurosciences, School of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom.
J Abnorm Psychol. 2006 Nov;115(4):760-70. doi: 10.1037/0021-843X.115.4.760.
In 2 experiments, the authors tested predictions from cognitive models of social anxiety regarding attentional biases for social and nonsocial cues by monitoring eye movements to pictures of faces and objects in high social anxiety (HSA) and low social anxiety (LSA) individuals. Under no-stress conditions (Experiment 1), HSA individuals initially directed their gaze toward neutral faces, relative to objects, more often than did LSA participants. However, under social-evaluative stress (Experiment 2), HSA individuals showed reduced biases in initial orienting and maintenance of gaze on faces (cf. objects) compared with the LSA group. HSA individuals were also relatively quicker to look at emotional faces than neutral faces but looked at emotional faces for less time, compared with LSA individuals, consistent with a vigilant-avoidant pattern of bias.
在两项实验中,作者通过监测高社交焦虑(HSA)和低社交焦虑(LSA)个体观看面部和物体图片时的眼动,测试了社交焦虑认知模型中关于社交和非社交线索注意偏向的预测。在无压力条件下(实验1),与LSA参与者相比,HSA个体最初更频繁地将目光指向中性面孔而非物体。然而,在社会评价压力下(实验2),与LSA组相比,HSA个体在初始注视定向和对面部(与物体相比)注视维持方面的偏向有所减少。与LSA个体相比,HSA个体看情绪面孔也相对比看中性面孔更快,但看情绪面孔的时间更短,这与一种警惕-回避的偏向模式一致。