Alizadeh Abolfath, Maleki Majid, Bassiri Hossienali, Alasti Mohammad, Emkanjoo Zahra, Haghjoo Majid, Arya Arash, Bagherzadeh Atallah, Fazelifar Amirfarjam, Sadr-Ameli Mohammad A
Department of Pacemaker and Electrophysiology, Rajaie Cardiovascular Medical Center, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2006 Nov;29(11):1251-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2006.00520.x.
Physiologic pacing is claimed to be superior to ventricular pacing in as much as it entails lower risk of atrial fibrillation, stroke, and atrial remodeling. There are few data on the relation between atrioventricular (AV) synchrony and atrial clot formation. Utilizing transesophageal echocardiography (TEE), this study sought to evaluate the effect of AV synchrony loss on left atrial physiology, atrial stasis, and clot formation.
We conducted a cross-sectional study on patients with both AV and ventricular pacing with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) >30%. TEE enabled us to explore atrial and pacing leads thrombi and measure left atrial appendage (LAA) flow velocity.
A total 72 patients (mean age, 65 +/- 11.7) were enrolled in the study. The pacing mode was VVI in 53% and AV sequential in 47% of patients. LVEF (mean +/- SD; %) was 53.3 +/- 6.2% in ventricular pacing mode and 52.2 +/- 6.6 in physiologic pacing mode. Thrombus formation on pacing lead (<10 mm in 97% of patients) was observed in 32% of all the patients (23% in patients with AV sequential pacing mode and 39% with VVI mode). Left atrial appendage flow velocity (LAA-FV) was significantly higher among the patients with AV sequential pacing mode (49.44 +/- 18 cm/s vs 40.94 +/- 19.4 cm/s, P value = 0.02). LAA-FV >40 cm/s was detected in 60% of the patients, 60% of whom were in physiologic mode. Left atrial size was significantly larger among the patients with VVI pacing mode (42.3 +/- 2.3 mm vs 37.79 +/- 4.5 mm, P = 0.001). Multivariate analysis showed no relation between LAA-FV and age, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, left atrial size, and left ventricular function. Only one patient had right atrial clot. There was no thrombus in the ventricles and atrial appendage.
Long-term loss of AV synchrony induced by VVI pacing is associated with the impairment of LAA contraction. Thrombus formation in the LAA is not increased by VVI pacing in patients with relatively good left ventricular (LV) function and sinus rhythm.
生理性起搏被认为优于心室起搏,因为其引发房颤、中风和心房重构的风险更低。关于房室(AV)同步性与心房血栓形成之间关系的数据较少。本研究利用经食管超声心动图(TEE)来评估AV同步性丧失对左心房生理功能、心房血流淤滞及血栓形成的影响。
我们对左心室射血分数(LVEF)>30%且同时采用AV和心室起搏的患者进行了一项横断面研究。TEE使我们能够探查心房和起搏导线血栓,并测量左心耳(LAA)血流速度。
共有72例患者(平均年龄65±11.7岁)纳入本研究。53%的患者起搏模式为VVI,47%为房室顺序起搏。心室起搏模式下LVEF(平均值±标准差;%)为53.3±6.2%,生理性起搏模式下为52.2±6.6%。在所有患者中,32%观察到起搏导线上有血栓形成(97%的患者血栓<10 mm)(房室顺序起搏模式患者中为23%,VVI模式患者中为39%)。房室顺序起搏模式患者的左心耳血流速度(LAA-FV)显著更高(49.44±18 cm/s对40.94±19.4 cm/s,P值=0.02)。60%的患者检测到LAA-FV>40 cm/s,其中60%处于生理性起搏模式。VVI起搏模式患者的左心房大小显著更大(42.3±2.3 mm对37.79±4.5 mm,P = 0.001)。多因素分析显示LAA-FV与年龄、高血压、糖尿病、左心房大小及左心室功能之间无关联。仅1例患者有右心房血栓。心室和心耳均无血栓。
VVI起搏导致的长期AV同步性丧失与LAA收缩功能受损有关。对于左心室(LV)功能相对良好且为窦性心律的患者,VVI起搏不会增加LAA血栓形成。