Türkyilmaz Z, Sönmez K, Karabulut R, Elbeğ S, Moralioğlu S, Demirtola A, Demiroğullari B, Ozen I O, Başaklar A C, Kale N
Department of Pediatric Surgery, Gazi University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey.
Scand J Clin Lab Invest. 2006;66(8):723-31. doi: 10.1080/00365510600975251.
To determine the diagnostic value of sequential white blood cell count (WBC), tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha) and interleukin-6 (IL-6) in patients with abdominal pain.
Tests were determined at hospital admission and 6 h later in 105 children. Patients who were non-operatively followed and had a normal histopathology were classified as the non-appendicitis (NA) group. Patients with symptoms consistent with appendicitis were classified as the appendicitis group (A). Data were analyzed as positive/negative predictive value, sensitivity, specificity and accuracy rate (AR). The global power of the variables in discriminating the patients between the two groups and advanced/simple appendicitis was assessed from the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC).
Initial measurements showed WBC to be a valuable diagnostic tool in acute appendicitis (AR = 74 %), whereas IL-6 and TNF-alpha were found not to be valuable. The second measurements revealed higher values, and IL-6 reached its highest AR (89 %). When initial values were evaluated in combination, the highest AR of 73 % was observed with TNF-alpha + WBC. The highest AR (90 %) was seen with IL-6 + TNF-alpha in the second measurements. ROC analysis showed WBC to be the most valuable parameter of the three. The area under the curve (AUC) was 0.750 for the initial measurement and 0.779 for the repeat measurement of WBC (p = 0.001). The most useful diagnostic parameter in discriminating between the simple and the advanced cases was IL-6 as assessed with the ROC curve (p<0.01).
WBC elevation in patients with suspected acute appendicitis is an important parameter supporting the diagnosis at initial admission, whereas IL-6 is a more valuable tool in diagnosing advanced appendicitis.
确定连续白细胞计数(WBC)、肿瘤坏死因子-α(TNF-α)和白细胞介素-6(IL-6)对腹痛患者的诊断价值。
对105例儿童在入院时及6小时后进行检测。非手术治疗且组织病理学正常的患者被归类为非阑尾炎(NA)组。有阑尾炎症状的患者被归类为阑尾炎组(A)。数据以阳性/阴性预测值、敏感性、特异性和准确率(AR)进行分析。通过受试者操作特征(ROC)曲线下面积评估变量区分两组患者以及区分进展期/单纯性阑尾炎的总体效能。
初始测量显示白细胞计数是急性阑尾炎的一项有价值的诊断工具(AR = 74%),而IL-6和TNF-α无诊断价值。第二次测量显示数值更高,IL-6的AR达到最高(89%)。综合评估初始值时,TNF-α + WBC的AR最高,为73%。第二次测量中,IL-6 + TNF-α的AR最高(90%)。ROC分析显示白细胞计数是三者中最有价值的参数。白细胞计数初始测量的曲线下面积(AUC)为0.750,重复测量的AUC为0.779(p = 0.001)。ROC曲线评估显示,区分单纯性和进展期病例最有用的诊断参数是IL-6(p<0.01)。
疑似急性阑尾炎患者白细胞计数升高是入院初期支持诊断的重要参数,而IL-6是诊断进展期阑尾炎更有价值的工具。