Armitage J O
Department of Internal Medicine, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha.
Ann Oncol. 1991 Jan;2 Suppl 1:37-41. doi: 10.1093/annonc/2.suppl_1.37.
Diffuse large cell lymphoma, the most common form of aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, has been known to be curable with combination chemotherapy for almost 20 years. Although occasional patients were cured with regimens like COP (cyclophosphamide/vincristine/prednisone) the development of four-drug regimens made cure possible in a significant percentage of patients. Subsequently, newer, so-called third-generation regimens incorporated even more drugs with an apparent increase in the cure rate. However, the identification of important clinical and biologic features in the patient or the tumor that predict for treatment outcome (prognostic factors) has complicated comparison between nonrandomized and nonconcurrent trials. Recently, the Southwest Oncology Group presented data from pilot studies showing that patients treated with ProMACE-CytaBOM (procarbazine/methotrexate/doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide/etoposide- cytarabine/bleomycin/vincristine/methotrexate), m-BACOD (methotrexate-bleomycin/doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide/vincristine/dexa met hasone) , and MACOD-B (methotrexate/doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide/vincristine/dexamethasone- ble omycin) did not seem to do better than patients treated in the past with CHOP cyclophosphamide/doxorubicin/vincristine/prednisone). Also, the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group has presented a study in which patients treated with a six-drug regimen did no better than those treated with a CHOP-like regimen. Some have interpreted these reports to mean that all patients with diffuse large cell lymphoma should receive CHOP, since they feel it to be safer. I believe this is not a good interpretation of the available data for the following reasons: (1) when administered at maximum tolerated doses, CHOP has the same approximate 5% treatment-related mortality seen with all regimens; (2) when CHOP is given at reduced (ie, safer) doses, it is not as effective; and (3) it is not yet clear that all patients with diffuse large cell lymphoma are the same in their response to treatment.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
弥漫性大细胞淋巴瘤是侵袭性非霍奇金淋巴瘤最常见的形式,近20年来已知联合化疗可治愈。虽然偶尔有患者通过COP(环磷酰胺/长春新碱/泼尼松)等方案治愈,但四药方案的出现使相当比例的患者治愈成为可能。随后,更新的所谓第三代方案纳入了更多药物,治愈率明显提高。然而,患者或肿瘤中预测治疗结果的重要临床和生物学特征(预后因素)的确定,使得非随机和非同期试验之间的比较变得复杂。最近,西南肿瘤协作组公布了初步研究数据,显示接受ProMACE-CytaBOM(丙卡巴肼/甲氨蝶呤/阿霉素/环磷酰胺/依托泊苷-阿糖胞苷/博来霉素/长春新碱/甲氨蝶呤)、m-BACOD(甲氨蝶呤-博来霉素/阿霉素/环磷酰胺/长春新碱/地塞米松)和MACOD-B(甲氨蝶呤/阿霉素/环磷酰胺/长春新碱/地塞米松-博来霉素)治疗的患者,似乎并不比过去接受CHOP(环磷酰胺/阿霉素/长春新碱/泼尼松)治疗的患者效果更好。此外,东部肿瘤协作组公布了一项研究,其中接受六药方案治疗的患者并不比接受类似CHOP方案治疗的患者效果更好。一些人将这些报告解读为所有弥漫性大细胞淋巴瘤患者都应接受CHOP治疗,因为他们认为CHOP更安全。我认为这种对现有数据的解读不佳,原因如下:(1)当以最大耐受剂量给药时,CHOP与所有方案一样,有大约5%的治疗相关死亡率;(2)当以较低(即更安全)剂量给予CHOP时,效果不佳;(3)目前尚不清楚所有弥漫性大细胞淋巴瘤患者对治疗的反应是否相同。(摘要截短于250字)