Hendrickson Rachel L, Huebner Colleen E, Riedy Christine A
Department of Dental Public Health Sciences, School of Dentistry, University of Washington, 1959 NE Pacific St, Box 357475 Seattle, WA, USA.
BMC Oral Health. 2006 Nov 16;6:14. doi: 10.1186/1472-6831-6-14.
This study examined the content and general readability of pediatric oral health education materials for parents of young children.
Twenty-seven pediatric oral health pamphlets or brochures from commercial, government, industry, and private nonprofit sources were analyzed for general readability ("usability") according to several parameters: readability, (Flesch-Kincaid grade level, Flesch Reading Ease, and SMOG grade level); thoroughness, (inclusion of topics important to young childrens' oral health); textual framework (frequency of complex phrases, use of pictures, diagrams, and bulleted text within materials); and terminology (frequency of difficult words and dental jargon).
Readability of the written texts ranged from 2nd to 9th grade. The average Flesch-Kincaid grade level for government publications was equivalent to a grade 4 reading level (4.73, range, 2.4-6.6); F-K grade levels for commercial publications averaged 8.1 (range, 6.9-8.9); and industry published materials read at an average Flesch-Kincaid grade level of 7.4 (range, 4.7-9.3). SMOG readability analysis, based on a count of polysyllabic words, consistently rated materials 2 to 3 grade levels higher than did the Flesch-Kincaid analysis. Government sources were significantly lower compared to commercial and industry sources for Flesch-Kincaid grade level and SMOG readability analysis. Content analysis found materials from commercial and industry sources more complex than government-sponsored publications, whereas commercial sources were more thorough in coverage of pediatric oral health topics. Different materials frequently contained conflicting information.
Pediatric oral health care materials are readily available, yet their quality and readability vary widely. In general, government publications are more readable than their commercial and industry counterparts. The criteria for usability and results of the analyses presented in this article can be used by consumers of dental educational materials to ensure that their choices are well-suited to their specific patient population.
本研究调查了面向幼儿家长的儿科口腔健康教育材料的内容和总体可读性。
根据几个参数对来自商业、政府、行业和私人非营利来源的27份儿科口腔健康宣传册或手册进行了总体可读性(“可用性”)分析:可读性(弗莱什-金凯德年级水平、弗莱什阅读简易度和烟雾年级水平);全面性(纳入对幼儿口腔健康重要的主题);文本框架(材料中复杂短语的频率、图片、图表和项目符号文本的使用);以及术语(难词和牙科行话的频率)。
书面文本的可读性从二年级到九年级不等。政府出版物的平均弗莱什-金凯德年级水平相当于四年级阅读水平(4.73,范围2.4 - 6.6);商业出版物的F - K年级水平平均为8.1(范围6.9 - 8.9);行业出版材料的平均弗莱什-金凯德年级水平为7.4(范围4.7 - 9.3)。基于多音节词计数的烟雾可读性分析始终将材料的评级比弗莱什-金凯德分析高2至3个年级水平。在弗莱什-金凯德年级水平和烟雾可读性分析方面,政府来源明显低于商业和行业来源。内容分析发现,商业和行业来源的材料比政府资助的出版物更复杂,而商业来源在儿科口腔健康主题的覆盖方面更全面。不同材料经常包含相互矛盾的信息。
儿科口腔保健材料很容易获得,但其质量和可读性差异很大。一般来说,政府出版物比商业和行业出版物更具可读性。本文中提出的可用性标准和分析结果可供牙科教育材料的消费者使用,以确保他们的选择非常适合其特定的患者群体。