Suppr超能文献

使用短亲水导丝进行内镜逆行胰胆管造影导管及附件交换:一项前瞻性研究

Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography catheter and accessory exchange using a short hydrophilic guide wire: a prospective study.

作者信息

Papachristou G I, Baron T H, Gleeson F, Levy M J, Topazian M D

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, Minnesota 55905, USA.

出版信息

Endoscopy. 2006 Nov;38(11):1133-6. doi: 10.1055/s-2006-944739.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS

Although hydrophilic guide wires can be used to facilitate stricture cannulation during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), some endoscopists avoid using them because of concerns about wire loss during exchange. There are no data available on the outcomes of using a short hydrophilic guide wire during ERCP. The aim of this study was to assess the outcomes of therapeutic ERCP procedures in which a short, completely hydrophilic guide wire was used exclusively.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 100 patients undergoing ERCP were studied prospectively. A 0.035-inch, 260-cm long, angled-tip hydrophilic wire (Terumo Glidewire) was used initially. Hydraulic catheter exchange was performed as follows: during catheter withdrawal the assistant advanced all the available wire into the catheter; a 12-ml syringe was then attached to the catheter and water was flushed under pressure to "float the wire" and maintain its position during catheter removal. Variables evaluated included exchange times and wire loss rates.

RESULTS

A total of 223 catheter exchanges were performed, 132 (59%) using the Olympus V-Scope (which held the wire in 62% of cases): 15% of exchanges were with catheters/accessories designed for short-wire use (Boston Scientific Rapid Exchange Biliary System or Rx System), and 85% were with a variety of standard-length accessories. Overall, the mean exchange time was 26 seconds (range 6 - 90 seconds, standard deviation 12 seconds). The mean exchange time was faster with the V-Scope and with non-Rx-System accessories. Wire loss occurred in 5 % of all exchanges. Desired ductal/stricture access was achieved in all the patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Exchange of short hydrophilic wires is quick and reliable. The Olympus V-Scope is able to hold the wire in some cases. Monorail-type devices and accessories slow catheter exchange down slightly because hydraulic exchange cannot be performed using these systems.

摘要

背景与研究目的

尽管亲水导丝可用于在内镜逆行胰胆管造影术(ERCP)期间协助通过狭窄部位进行插管,但一些内镜医师因担心在导丝交换过程中导丝丢失而避免使用。目前尚无关于在ERCP期间使用短亲水导丝的结果的数据。本研究的目的是评估仅使用短的、完全亲水导丝的治疗性ERCP手术的结果。

患者与方法

前瞻性研究了总共100例接受ERCP的患者。最初使用一根0.035英寸、260厘米长、尖端成角的亲水导丝(泰尔茂滑导丝)。液压导管交换操作如下:在拔出导管时,助手将所有可用导丝推进导管;然后将一个12毫升注射器连接到导管上,并在压力下冲洗水以“漂浮导丝”并在移除导管期间保持其位置。评估的变量包括交换时间和导丝丢失率。

结果

总共进行了223次导管交换,132次(59%)使用奥林巴斯V型内镜(在62%的病例中能固定导丝):15%的交换使用了专为短导丝设计的导管/附件(波士顿科学快速交换胆道系统或Rx系统),85%使用了各种标准长度的附件。总体而言,平均交换时间为26秒(范围6 - 90秒,标准差12秒)。使用V型内镜和非Rx系统附件时平均交换时间更快。在所有交换中导丝丢失发生在5%。所有患者均成功进入所需的胆管/狭窄部位。

结论

短亲水导丝的交换快速且可靠。奥林巴斯V型内镜在某些情况下能够固定导丝。单轨型装置和附件会使导管交换稍微减慢,因为无法使用这些系统进行液压交换。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验