de Jong Peter J, Martens Sander
Department of Clinical and Developmental Clinical Psychology, University of Groningen, Grote Kruisstraat 1/2, 9712 Groningen, The Netherlands.
Behav Res Ther. 2007 Jun;45(6):1285-94. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2006.10.003. Epub 2006 Nov 20.
Facial information and attention to facial displays are distributed over spatial as well as temporal domains. Thus far, research on selective attention to (dis)approving faces in the context of social anxiety has concentrated primarily on the spatial domain. Using a rapid serial visual presentation (RSVP) paradigm, the present study examined the temporal characteristics of visual attention for happy and angry faces in high- (n=16) and low-socially anxious individuals (n=17), to test whether also in the temporal domain socially anxious individuals are characterized by threat-confirming attentional biases. Results indicated that presenting angry faces as the first target (T1) did not aggravate the detection of the emotional expression of the second target (T2). Yet, participants generally showed superior detection of the emotional expression of T2, if T2 was an angry face. Casting doubt on the role of such attenuated attentional blink for angry faces in social anxiety, no evidence emerged to indicate that this effect was relatively strong in high-socially anxious individuals. Finally, the presentation of an angry face as T2 resulted in a relatively hampered identification of a happy-T1. Again, this "backward blink" was not especially pronounced in high-socially anxious individuals. The present anger superiority effects are consistent with evolutionary models stressing the importance of being especially vigilant for signals of dominance. Since the effects were not especially pronounced in high-anxious individuals, the present study adds to previous findings indicating that socially anxious individuals are not characterized by a bias in the (explicit) detection of emotional expressions [Philippot, P., & Douilliez, C. (2005). Social phobics do not misinterpret facial expression of emotion. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 43, 639-652].
面部信息以及对面部表情的关注分布在空间和时间维度上。到目前为止,在社交焦虑背景下对选择性关注(不)赞同面孔的研究主要集中在空间维度。本研究采用快速序列视觉呈现(RSVP)范式,考察了高社交焦虑个体(n = 16)和低社交焦虑个体(n = 17)对快乐和愤怒面孔视觉关注的时间特征,以测试在时间维度上社交焦虑个体是否也具有威胁确认性注意偏差。结果表明,将愤怒面孔作为第一个目标(T1)呈现并不会加重对第二个目标(T2)情绪表达的检测。然而,如果T2是愤怒面孔,参与者通常对T2的情绪表达检测表现更优。对社交焦虑中愤怒面孔这种减弱的注意瞬脱作用存疑的是,没有证据表明这种效应在高社交焦虑个体中相对更强。最后,将愤怒面孔作为T2呈现会导致对快乐T1的识别相对受阻。同样,这种“反向瞬脱”在高社交焦虑个体中并不特别明显。目前的愤怒优势效应与强调对优势信号特别警惕重要性的进化模型一致。由于这些效应在高焦虑个体中并不特别明显,本研究补充了先前的研究结果,表明社交焦虑个体在(明确)检测情绪表达方面不存在偏差[菲利普ot,P.,& 杜利耶兹,C.(2005)。社交恐惧症患者不会误解面部情绪表达。行为研究与治疗,43,639 - 652]。