Faghel-Soubeyrand Simon, Lecomte Tania, Bravo M Archibaldo, Lepage Martin, Potvin Stéphane, Abdel-Baki Amal, Villeneuve Marie, Gosselin Frédéric
Département de Psychologie, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Canada.
School of Psychology, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
NPJ Schizophr. 2020 Oct 1;6(1):28. doi: 10.1038/s41537-020-00116-1.
Deficits in social functioning are especially severe amongst schizophrenia individuals with the prevalent comorbidity of social anxiety disorder (SZ&SAD). Yet, the mechanisms underlying the recognition of facial expression of emotions-a hallmark of social cognition-are practically unexplored in SZ&SAD. Here, we aim to reveal the visual representations SZ&SAD (n = 16) and controls (n = 14) rely on for facial expression recognition. We ran a total of 30,000 trials of a facial expression categorization task with Bubbles, a data-driven technique. Results showed that SZ&SAD's ability to categorize facial expression was impared compared to controls. More severe negative symptoms (flat affect, apathy, reduced social drive) was associated with more impaired emotion recognition ability, and with more biases in attributing neutral affect to faces. Higher social anxiety symptoms, on the other hand, was found to enhance the reaction speed to neutral and angry faces. Most importantly, Bubbles showed that these abnormalities could be explained by inefficient visual representations of emotions: compared to controls, SZ&SAD subjects relied less on fine facial cues (high spatial frequencies) and more on coarse facial cues (low spatial frequencies). SZ&SAD participants also never relied on the eye regions (only on the mouth) to categorize facial expressions. We discuss how possible interactions between early (low sensitivity to coarse information) and late stages of the visual system (overreliance on these coarse features) might disrupt SZ&SAD's recognition of facial expressions. Our findings offer perceptual mechanisms through which comorbid SZ&SAD impairs crucial aspects of social cognition, as well as functional psychopathology.
在患有普遍共病社交焦虑障碍的精神分裂症患者(SZ&SAD)中,社交功能缺陷尤为严重。然而,情绪面部表情识别这一社会认知的标志背后的机制,在SZ&SAD中实际上尚未得到探索。在这里,我们旨在揭示SZ&SAD患者(n = 16)和对照组(n = 14)在面部表情识别中所依赖的视觉表征。我们使用数据驱动技术“气泡法”进行了总共30000次面部表情分类任务试验。结果表明,与对照组相比,SZ&SAD患者对面部表情进行分类的能力受损。更严重的阴性症状(情感平淡、冷漠、社交驱动力降低)与更受损的情绪识别能力相关,并且在将中性表情归因于面部时存在更多偏差。另一方面,较高的社交焦虑症状被发现会提高对中性和愤怒面孔的反应速度。最重要的是,“气泡法”表明这些异常可以通过情绪的低效视觉表征来解释:与对照组相比,SZ&SAD患者较少依赖精细的面部线索(高空间频率),而更多依赖粗糙的面部线索(低空间频率)。SZ&SAD参与者在对面部表情进行分类时也从不依赖眼睛区域(仅依赖嘴巴)。我们讨论了视觉系统早期阶段(对粗糙信息低敏感性)和晚期阶段(过度依赖这些粗糙特征)之间可能的相互作用如何可能扰乱SZ&SAD患者对面部表情的识别。我们的研究结果提供了感知机制,通过这些机制,共病的SZ&SAD损害了社会认知的关键方面以及功能性精神病理学。