Schueller-Weidekamm Claudia, Schaefer-Prokop Cornelia M, Weber Michael, Herold Christian J, Prokop Mathias
Department of Radiology, University Hospital of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Radiology. 2006 Dec;241(3):899-907. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2413040128.
To retrospectively compare a low kilovoltage scanning protocol with a reduced radiation dose with a standard high kilovoltage, moderate-dose protocol for the depiction of central and peripheral pulmonary arteries at single-detector spiral computed tomography (CT).
This retrospective study had institutional review board approval; informed consent was waived. A 100-kVp protocol (volume CT dose index [CTDI(vol)], 3.4 mGy) was compared with a standard 140-kVp protocol (CTDI(vol), 10.4 mGy) in two groups that were each composed of 35 consecutive patients who were suspected of having pulmonary embolism (PE) and scanned with otherwise identical acquisition parameters and contrast material injection protocols. Mean main pulmonary artery enhancement and maximum enhancement in peripheral pulmonary arteries were compared. In a blinded evaluation, the percentages of segmental and subsegmental arteries that were considered analyzable for assessment of PE were determined. Overall image quality and delineation of various anatomic areas were subjectively assessed. Comparison of percentages of analyzable segmental and subsegmental arteries and subjective grading of image quality between the two different protocols were performed with the Mann-Whitney U test.
There were 38 male and 24 female patients (mean age, 61 years; range, 17-86 years) in the final evaluation. There was a significantly higher average CT number in the main pulmonary artery (379 HU +/- 95) for the 100-kVp protocol than for the 140-kVp protocol (268 HU +/- 63, P < .001, two-sided t test). Maximum CT numbers in peripheral pulmonary arteries at the level of the aortic arch and lung bases, respectively, were 290 HU +/- 91 and 279 HU +/- 100 for 100 kVp and 185 HU +/- 65 and 144 HU +/- 63 for 140 kVp (P < .001). Mean percentage of subsegmental arteries considered analyzable per patient was higher for 100 kVp than for 140 kVp (segmental arteries, 92% vs 88%, P = .13; subsegmental arteries, 71% vs 55%, P < .001). Subjective grading of overall image quality and of the delineation of structures in the lungs, mediastinum, and upper abdomen did not significantly differ between protocols.
At reduced radiation exposure, low kilovoltage scanning increases the percentage of central and peripheral pulmonary arteries that can be evaluated with CT angiography without a substantial decrease in image quality.
回顾性比较低千伏扫描方案(降低辐射剂量)与标准高千伏、中等剂量方案在单排螺旋计算机断层扫描(CT)中对中央及外周肺动脉的显示情况。
本回顾性研究经机构审查委员会批准;无需知情同意。将100 kVp方案(容积CT剂量指数[CTDI(vol)],3.4 mGy)与标准140 kVp方案(CTDI(vol),10.4 mGy)进行比较,两组各由35例连续怀疑患有肺栓塞(PE)的患者组成,扫描时采用相同的采集参数和对比剂注射方案。比较主肺动脉的平均强化程度及外周肺动脉的最大强化程度。在盲法评估中,确定可用于评估PE的节段性和亚节段性动脉的百分比。对整体图像质量及不同解剖区域的显示情况进行主观评估。采用Mann-Whitney U检验对两种不同方案之间可分析的节段性和亚节段性动脉百分比及图像质量主观分级进行比较。
最终评估的患者中,男性38例,女性24例(平均年龄61岁;范围17 - 86岁)。100 kVp方案主肺动脉的平均CT值(379 HU ± 95)显著高于140 kVp方案(268 HU ± 63,P <.001,双侧t检验)。100 kVp时,主动脉弓水平和肺底部外周肺动脉的最大CT值分别为290 HU ± 91和279 HU ± 100,140 kVp时分别为185 HU ± 65和144 HU ± 63(P <.001)。100 kVp时每位患者可分析的亚节段性动脉的平均百分比高于140 kVp(节段性动脉,92%对88%,P =.13;亚节段性动脉,71%对55%,P <.001)。两种方案在整体图像质量以及肺部、纵隔和上腹部结构显示的主观分级方面无显著差异。
在降低辐射暴露的情况下,低千伏扫描可增加CT血管造影能够评估的中央及外周肺动脉的百分比,且图像质量无显著下降。