Kyrychenko Pavlo, Kohler Connie, Sathiakumar Nalini
Department of Infectious Diseases and Epidemiology, Vinnitsa National Pirogov Memorial Medical University, Vinnitsa, Ukraine.
J Adolesc Health. 2006 Dec;39(6):900-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2006.06.006. Epub 2006 Aug 30.
To assess changes observed in knowledge, attitudes toward people living with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), self-efficacy and behavioral intentions of senior secondary school students after an HIV/AIDS (acquired immune deficiency syndrome) educational intervention in Vinnitsa, Ukraine.
A quasi-experimental, nonequivalent control group design with pretest-posttest components was employed. Two secondary schools (intervention and control) were randomly assigned to the study. A random sample of the 15-16-year-old students (100 participants in each school) completed anonymous self-reported pre- and postintervention questionnaires. In addition, a three-month follow-up questionnaire was administrated in both schools to assess the longevity of the intervention outcomes. Outcome scale scores were compared between the two groups on baseline, first, and second posttests separately. We used the Pearson chi-square test for categorical data and a t-test for difference in mean scores.
After intervention we observed significantly higher knowledge, attitudes, and self-efficacy scores among students in the intervention school than in the control school (96.2 +/- 6.2 [SD] vs. 82.6 +/- 8.3, respectively, p < .01; 24.4 +/- 4.4 vs. 21.7 +/- 4.8, respectively, p < .01; 21.9 +/- 2.6 vs. 20 +/- 3.8, respectively, p < .01). As a result of the intervention, we also report significantly higher proportions of students in the intervention school than in the control school who would not intend to use alcohol and narcotics and who intend to use condoms (p < .01).
Our AIDS education program was able to considerably improve students' knowledge, attitudes and self-efficacy, and promoted positive changes in participants' behavior intentions; it should therefore be extended to more schools to multiply its effects. However, in the context of evaluation, studies with actual HIV-risk behavior outcomes are urgent for Ukraine.
评估在乌克兰文尼察对高中生进行艾滋病毒/艾滋病(获得性免疫缺陷综合征)教育干预后,观察到的这些学生在知识、对艾滋病毒感染者的态度、自我效能感以及行为意图方面的变化。
采用带有前测-后测成分的准实验性、非等效对照组设计。随机选取两所中学(干预组和对照组)参与研究。从15 - 16岁的学生中随机抽取样本(每所学校100名参与者),他们完成了干预前后匿名的自我报告问卷。此外,在两所学校都进行了为期三个月的随访问卷,以评估干预效果的持久性。分别在基线、首次和第二次后测时比较两组的结果量表得分。对于分类数据,我们使用Pearson卡方检验,对于平均得分差异,我们使用t检验。
干预后,我们观察到干预学校的学生在知识、态度和自我效能感得分上显著高于对照学校(分别为96.2±6.2[标准差]对82.6±8.3,p<.01;24.4±4.4对21.7±4.8,分别为p<.01;21.9±2.6对20±3.8,分别为p<.01)。由于干预,我们还报告称,干预学校中表示不打算使用酒精和毒品以及打算使用避孕套的学生比例显著高于对照学校(p<.01)。
我们的艾滋病教育项目能够显著提高学生的知识、态度和自我效能感,并促进参与者行为意图的积极变化;因此,应将其推广到更多学校以扩大其效果。然而,在评估方面,对于乌克兰来说,开展具有实际艾滋病毒风险行为结果的研究迫在眉睫。