Lassi Zohra S, Kedzior Sophie G E, Tariq Wajeeha, Jadoon Yamna, Das Jai K, Bhutta Zulfiqar A
Robinson Research Institute University of Adelaide Adelaide Australia.
Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, Robinson Research Institute University of Adelaide Adelaide Australia.
Campbell Syst Rev. 2021 May 5;17(2):e1156. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1156. eCollection 2021 Jun.
The preconception period is an ideal time to introduce interventions relating to nutrition and other lifestyle factors to ensure good pregnancy preparedness, and to promote health of mothers and babies. In adolescents, malnutrition and early pregnancy are the common challenges, particularly among those who live in low- and middle-income countries (LMIC) where 99% of all maternal and newborn deaths occur. These girls receive little or no attention until their first pregnancy and often the interventions after pregnancy are too late to revert any detrimental health risks that may have occurred due to malnutrition and early pregnancy.
To synthesise the evidence of the effectiveness of preconception care interventions relating to delayed age at first pregnancy, optimising inter-pregnancy intervals, periconception folic acid, and periconception iron-folic acid supplementation on maternal, pregnancy, birth and child outcomes.
Numerous electronic databases (e.g., CINAHL, ERIC) and databases of selected development agencies or research firms were systematically searched for all available years up to July 2019. In addition, we searched the reference lists of relevant articles and reviews, and asked experts in the area about ongoing and unpublished studies.
Primary studies, including large-scale programme evaluations that assessed the effectiveness of interventions using randomised controlled trials (RCTs) or quasi-experimental designs (natural experiments, controlled before-after studies, regression discontinuity designs, interrupted time series [ITS]), that targeted women of reproductive age (i.e., 10-49 years) during the pre- and periconceptional period in LMICs were included. Interventions were compared against no intervention, standard of care or placebo.
Two or more review authors independently reviewed searches, selected studies for inclusion or exclusion, extracted data and assessed risk of bias. We used random-effects model to conduct meta-analyses, given the diverse contexts, participants, and interventions, and separate meta-analyses for the same outcome was performed with different study designs (ITS, RCTs and controlled before after studies). For each comparison, the findings were descriptively summarised in text which included detailing the contextual factors (e.g., setting) to assess their impact on the implementation and effectiveness of each intervention.
We included a total of 43 studies; two of these were included in both delaying pregnancy and optimising interpregnancy intervals resulting in 26 studies for delaying the age at first pregnancy (14 RCTs, 12 quasi-experimental), four for optimising interpregnancy intervals (one RCT, three quasi-experimental), five on periconceptional folic acid supplementation (two RCTs, three quasi-experimental), and 10 on periconceptional iron-folic acid supplementation (nine RCTs, one quasi-experimental). Geographically, studies were predominantly conducted across Africa and Asia, with few studies from North and Central America and took place in a combination of settings including community, schools and clinical. The education on sexual health and contraception interventions to delay the age at first pregnancy may make little or no difference on risk of unintended pregnancy (risk ratio [RR], 0.42; 95% confidence internal [CI], 0.07-3.26; two studies, =490; random-effect; .009; = 85%; low certainty of evidence using GRADE assessment), however, it significantly improved the use of condom (ever) (RR, 1.54; 95% CI, 1.08-2.20; six studies, = 1604; random-effect, heterogeneity: .004; = 71%). Education on sexual health and and provision of contraceptive along with involvement of male partneron optimising interpregnancy intervals probably makes little or no difference on the risk of unintended pregnancies when compared to education on sexual health only (RR, 0.32; 95% CI, 0.01-7.45; one study, = 45; moderate certainty of evidence using GRADE assessments). However, education on sexual health and contraception intervention alone or with provision of contraceptive showed a significant improvement in the uptake of contraceptive method. We are uncertain whether periconceptional folic acid supplementation reduces the incidence of neural tube defects (NTDs) (RR, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.41-0.77; two studies, = 248,056; random-effect; heterogeneity: .36; = 0%; very low certainty of evidence using GRADE assessment). We are uncertain whether preconception iron-folic acid supplementation reduces anaemia (RR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.53-0.81; six studies; = 3430, random-effect; heterogeneity: < .001; = 88%; very low certainty of evidence using GRADE assessment) even when supplemented weekly (RR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.55-0.88; six studies; = 2661; random-effect; heterogeneity: < .001; = 88%; very low certainty of evidence using GRADE assessments),and in school set-ups (RR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.51-0.86; four studies; = 3005; random-effect; heterogeneity: < .0001; = 87%; very low certainty of evidence using GRADE assessment). Data on adverse effects were reported on in five studies for iron-folic acid, with the main complaint relating to gastrointestinal side effects. The quality of evidence across the interventions of interest was variable (ranging from very low to moderate) which may be attributed to the different study designs included in this review. Concerning risk of bias, the most common concerns were related to blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) and whether there were similar baseline characteristic across intervention and comparison groups.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: There is evidence that education on sexual health and contraception interventions can improve contraceptive use and knowledge related to sexual health, this review also provides further support for the use of folic acid in pregnancy to reduce NTDs, and notes that weekly regimes of IFA are most effective in reducing anaemia. However the certainty of the evidence was very low and therefore more robust trials and research is required, including ensuring consistency for reporting unplanned pregnancies, and further studies to determine which intervention settings (school, community, clinic) are most effective. Although this review demonstrates promising findings, more robust evidence from RCTs are required from LMICs to further support the evidence.
孕前阶段是引入与营养及其他生活方式因素相关干预措施的理想时机,以确保做好充分的怀孕准备,并促进母婴健康。在青少年中,营养不良和早孕是常见的挑战,尤其是在低收入和中等收入国家(LMIC),99%的孕产妇和新生儿死亡都发生在这些国家。这些女孩在首次怀孕前很少或根本没有受到关注,而且往往在怀孕后的干预措施为时已晚,无法消除因营养不良和早孕可能产生的任何有害健康风险。
综合孕前保健干预措施在延迟首次怀孕年龄、优化两次怀孕间隔、孕前补充叶酸以及孕前补充铁 - 叶酸对孕产妇、妊娠、分娩和儿童结局有效性的证据。
对众多电子数据库(如CINAHL、ERIC)以及选定的发展机构或研究公司的数据库进行了系统检索,涵盖截至2019年7月的所有可用年份。此外,我们还检索了相关文章和综述的参考文献列表,并向该领域的专家询问了正在进行和未发表的研究。
纳入主要研究,包括大规模项目评估,这些评估使用随机对照试验(RCT)或准实验设计(自然实验、前后对照研究、回归间断设计、中断时间序列[ITS])评估干预措施的有效性,研究对象为低收入和中等收入国家孕前和孕早期的育龄妇女(即10 - 49岁)。将干预措施与无干预、标准护理或安慰剂进行比较。
两名或更多综述作者独立审查检索结果,选择纳入或排除的研究,提取数据并评估偏倚风险。鉴于背景、参与者和干预措施的多样性,我们使用随机效应模型进行荟萃分析,并对相同结局采用不同研究设计(ITS、RCT和前后对照研究)分别进行荟萃分析。对于每次比较,研究结果在文本中进行描述性总结,包括详细说明背景因素(如环境),以评估其对每种干预措施实施和有效性的影响。
我们共纳入43项研究;其中两项研究同时纳入了延迟怀孕和优化两次怀孕间隔的内容,因此有26项研究涉及延迟首次怀孕年龄(14项RCT,12项准实验),4项涉及优化两次怀孕间隔(1项RCT,3项准实验),5项关于孕前补充叶酸(2项RCT,3项准实验),10项关于孕前补充铁 - 叶酸(9项RCT,1项准实验)。从地理位置来看,研究主要在非洲和亚洲进行,北美和中美洲的研究较少,研究场所包括社区、学校和临床等多种环境。关于性健康和避孕干预措施以延迟首次怀孕年龄的教育,对意外怀孕风险可能几乎没有影响(风险比[RR],0.42;95%置信区间[CI],0.07 - 3.26;两项研究,n = 490;随机效应;I² = 0.009;Tau² = 85%;使用GRADE评估证据确定性低),然而,它显著提高了避孕套(曾经使用过)的使用率(RR,1.54;95% CI,1.08 - 2.20;六项研究,n = 1604;随机效应,异质性:I² = 0.004;Tau² = 71%)。与仅进行性健康教育相比,性健康和避孕教育以及提供避孕措施并让男性伴侣参与,在优化两次怀孕间隔方面对意外怀孕风险可能几乎没有影响(RR,0.32;95% CI,0.01 - 7.45;一项研究,n = 45;使用GRADE评估证据确定性中等)。然而,单独的性健康和避孕干预措施或与提供避孕措施相结合,显示出避孕方法采用率有显著提高。我们不确定孕前补充叶酸是否能降低神经管缺陷(NTDs)的发生率(RR,0.