Zemach Iris, Chang Susan, Teller Davida Y
Department of Psychology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195-1525, USA.
Vision Res. 2007 May;47(10):1368-81. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2006.09.024. Epub 2006 Nov 21.
Infants show spontaneous looking preferences among isoluminant chromatic stimuli [Adams, R. J. (1987). An evaluation of color preferences in early infancy. Infant Behavior and Development, 10, 143-150; Bornstein, M. H. (1975). Qualities of color vision in infancy. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 19 (3), 401-419.]. These differences in preference have often been called "hue" or "color" preferences, and attributed to differences in hue, but there are alternative explanations. Spontaneous preference variations remain after stimuli are equated for adult brightness, and thus cannot be attributed to adult-like brightness differences [Teller, D. Y., Civan, A., & Bronson-Castain, K. (2004). Infants' spontaneous color preferences are not due to adult-like brightness variations. Visual Neuroscience, 21 (3), 397-401]. In the present paper, we address three more alternative explanations: colorimetric purity; infant detection thresholds; and adult-like variations in saturation. Three experiments were conducted. In Experiment 1 we measured infants' spontaneous preferences for each of 22 different chromatic stimuli of varying dominant wavelength and colorimetric purity, each paired against the same white standard. In Experiment 2, we measured infants' chromatic detection thresholds. In Experiment 3, adult subjects made saturation matches between a blue-green standard and each of five other chromatic stimuli. Infant detection thresholds accounted for 34% of the variance in infant "hue" preferences, much more than colorimetric purity (2.4%) or adult saturation judgments (3%), but none of the three variables accounted for the majority of the variance. In our view, the most likely remaining option is that infants' spontaneous "hue" preferences indeed arise from preferences for the hues of stimuli that adults see as blue, purple and red.
婴儿在等亮度的彩色刺激中表现出自发的注视偏好[亚当斯,R. J.(1987年)。对婴儿早期颜色偏好的评估。《婴儿行为与发展》,10,143 - 150;伯恩斯坦,M. H.(1975年)。婴儿期的色觉特性。《实验社会心理学杂志》,19(3),401 - 419。]。这些偏好差异常被称为“色调”或“颜色”偏好,并归因于色调差异,但也有其他解释。在刺激的成人亮度相等后,自发偏好变化仍然存在,因此不能归因于类似成人的亮度差异[泰勒,D. Y.,西万,A.,& 布朗森 - 卡斯坦,K.(2004年)。婴儿的自发颜色偏好并非由于类似成人的亮度变化。《视觉神经科学》,21(3),397 - 401]。在本文中,我们探讨另外三种替代解释:色度纯度;婴儿检测阈值;以及类似成人的饱和度变化。进行了三项实验。在实验1中,我们测量了婴儿对22种不同的、具有不同主波长和色度纯度的彩色刺激的自发偏好,每种刺激都与相同的白色标准进行配对。在实验2中,我们测量了婴儿的颜色检测阈值。在实验3中,成年受试者对蓝绿色标准与其他五种彩色刺激进行了饱和度匹配。婴儿检测阈值占婴儿“色调”偏好方差的34%,远高于色度纯度(2.4%)或成人饱和度判断(3%),但这三个变量都没有占方差的大部分。我们认为,最有可能的剩余选项是,婴儿的自发“色调”偏好确实源于对成人视为蓝色、紫色和红色的刺激色调的偏好。