Simpson Andrea, Hersbach Adam A, McDermott Hugh J
Department of Otolaryngology, The University of Melbourne, Australia.
Int J Audiol. 2006 Nov;45(11):619-29. doi: 10.1080/14992020600825508.
Previous investigation of an experimental, wearable frequency-compression hearing aid revealed improvements in speech perception for a group of listeners with moderately sloping audiograms (Simpson et al, 2005). In the frequency-compression hearing aid, high frequencies (above 1600 Hz) were amplified in addition to being lowered in frequency. Lower frequencies were amplified without frequency shifting. In the present study, an identical frequency-compression scheme was evaluated in a group of seven subjects, all of whom had steeply sloping hearing losses. No significant differences in group mean scores were found between the frequency-compression device and a conventional hearing instrument for understanding speech in quiet. Testing in noise showed improvements for the frequency-compression scheme for only one of the five subjects tested. Subjectively, all but one of the subjects preferred the sound quality of the conventional hearing instruments. In conclusion, the experimental frequency-compression scheme provided only limited benefit to these listeners with steeply sloping hearing losses.
先前对一种实验性可穿戴频率压缩助听器的研究表明,对于一组具有中度斜坡型听力图的听众,其言语感知能力有所改善(辛普森等人,2005年)。在该频率压缩助听器中,高频(高于1600赫兹)除了频率降低外还被放大。低频被放大但不进行频率转换。在本研究中,对一组七名受试者评估了相同的频率压缩方案,所有受试者均患有陡峭斜坡型听力损失。在安静环境中理解言语时,频率压缩设备与传统助听器之间在组平均得分上未发现显著差异。在噪声环境下测试时,仅五名受试对象中的一名在频率压缩方案测试中有所改善。主观上,除一名受试者外,其他所有受试者都更喜欢传统助听器的音质。总之,实验性频率压缩方案仅为这些患有陡峭斜坡型听力损失的听众提供了有限的益处。