Novak Michael A, Black Jennifer M, Koch Dawn B
Carle Clinic Association, Urbana, IL 61801, USA.
Otol Neurotol. 2007 Aug;28(5):609-14. doi: 10.1097/mao.0b013e318043014c.
This study compared preoperative and postoperative cochlear implant benefit in subjects with steeply sloping high-frequency hearing losses (HLs) who were implanted with standard long cochlear implant electrodes to: 1) determine the effect of etiology, 2) compare outcomes in studies exploring the use of combined electrical and acoustic stimulation, and 3) compare outcomes in patients implanted using standard criteria.
Retrospective case review.
Tertiary referral center.
Nine adults with steeply sloping high-frequency congenital (n=2) or acquired (n=7) bilateral sensorineural HL. All pure-tone audiograms fit the criteria for trials of a short electrode aimed at preserving low-frequency acoustic hearing.
Subjects received full insertion of a standard cochlear implant long electrode in the poorer ear.
Preoperative versus postoperative audiograms, word and sentence recognition in quiet and noise.
Patients with progressive acquired HLs experienced significantly improved speech understanding in quiet and in noise with the cochlear implant, especially when combined with hearing aid use in the contralateral ear. Patients with congenital HLs experienced little or no improvement in the implanted ear when tested with the implant alone, but achieved some benefit when the implant was combined with a hearing aid in the nonimplanted ear.
Based on this small sample, patients with acquired steeply sloping high-frequency HLs obtain significant benefit from cochlear implantation with standard long electrodes. In progressive losses, full insertion of a long electrode would be preferable to a short electrode because acoustic hearing may diminish over time. In contrast, patients with congenital losses may not benefit from long electrodes, and might be better served by implanting a short electrode, thereby allowing use of low-frequency acoustic stimulation.
本研究比较了植入标准长耳蜗植入电极的高频陡降型听力损失(HL)患者术前和术后的人工耳蜗获益情况,以:1)确定病因的影响;2)比较探索联合电刺激和声刺激使用的研究结果;3)比较按照标准标准植入患者的结果。
回顾性病例分析。
三级转诊中心。
9名高频陡降型先天性(n = 2)或后天性(n = 7)双侧感音神经性HL的成年人。所有纯音听力图均符合短电极试验标准,旨在保留低频听力。
受试者在较差耳中完全植入标准人工耳蜗长电极。
术前与术后听力图、安静和噪声环境下的单词和句子识别。
后天性进行性HL患者在使用人工耳蜗时,安静和噪声环境下的言语理解能力均有显著改善,尤其是在对侧耳使用助听器的情况下。先天性HL患者单独使用人工耳蜗测试时,植入耳几乎没有改善,但在未植入耳使用助听器的情况下,植入耳有一定获益。
基于这个小样本,后天性高频陡降型HL患者通过植入标准长电极人工耳蜗可获得显著获益。在进行性听力损失中,长电极完全插入比短电极更可取,因为随着时间推移,听力可能会下降。相比之下,先天性听力损失患者可能无法从长电极中获益,植入短电极可能更好,从而可以使用低频声刺激。