Piepers Sanne, van den Berg Jan-Paul, Kalmijn Sandra, van der Pol W-Ludo, Wokke John H J, Lindeman Eline, van den Berg Leonard H
Department of Neurology, Rudolph Magnus Institute of Neuroscience, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Amyotroph Lateral Scler. 2006 Dec;7(4):195-200. doi: 10.1080/14660820500514974.
Symptoms of nocturnal hypoventilation may negatively influence the quality of life (QoL) of ALS patients long before respiratory failure ensues. Non-invasive mechanical ventilation (NIV) is considered a treatment option for nocturnal hypoventilation. The primary objective of NIV is improving quality of life (QoL). It may also prolong life by several months. A systematic review of the literature was performed to analyse what is known of the effect of NIV on survival, QoL and other outcome measures. A computerized literature search was performed to identify controlled clinical trials and observational studies of treatment of ALS-associated nocturnal hypoventilation from 1985 until May 2005. Twelve studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Four studies were retrospective, seven prospective and in one study randomization was used. All studies reported beneficial effects of NIV on all outcome measures. In seven studies NIV was associated with prolonged survival in patients tolerant for NIV, and five studies reported an improved QoL. In conclusion, studies on the use of NIV in ALS differ in study design and endpoint definitions. All studies suggest a beneficial effect on QoL and other outcome measures (Evidence level Class II-III). Well-designed randomized controlled trials comparing the effect on QoL and survival have not been performed.
早在呼吸衰竭发生之前,夜间通气不足的症状就可能对肌萎缩侧索硬化症(ALS)患者的生活质量(QoL)产生负面影响。无创机械通气(NIV)被认为是治疗夜间通气不足的一种选择。NIV的主要目标是改善生活质量(QoL)。它还可能使寿命延长几个月。我们进行了一项系统的文献综述,以分析已知的NIV对生存率、QoL和其他结局指标的影响。通过计算机化文献检索,以识别1985年至2005年5月期间治疗ALS相关夜间通气不足的对照临床试验和观察性研究。十二项研究符合纳入标准。四项研究为回顾性研究,七项为前瞻性研究,一项研究使用了随机分组。所有研究均报告了NIV对所有结局指标的有益影响。在七项研究中,NIV与NIV耐受患者的生存期延长相关,五项研究报告生活质量得到改善。总之,关于在ALS中使用NIV的研究在研究设计和终点定义方面存在差异。所有研究均表明对生活质量和其他结局指标有有益影响(证据水平为II-III级)。尚未进行比较对生活质量和生存率影响的精心设计的随机对照试验。