Suppr超能文献

“清醒”腹腔镜检查用于评估可疑的腹部穿透伤。

"Awake" laparoscopy for the evaluation of equivocal penetrating abdominal wounds.

作者信息

Weinberg Jordan A, Magnotti Louis J, Edwards Norma M, Claridge Jeffrey A, Minard Gayle, Fabian Timothy C, Croce Martin A

机构信息

Department of Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA.

出版信息

Injury. 2007 Jan;38(1):60-4. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2006.08.061. Epub 2006 Nov 28.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Diagnostic laparoscopy is useful for the assessment of equivocal penetrating abdominal wounds, and has become the modality of choice for the evaluation of such wounds at our institution. We hypothesised that, in appropriate patients, diagnostic "awake" laparoscopy (AL) could be performed under local anaesthesia in the emergency department (ED), allowing for expedited discharge and potential cost savings.

METHODS

Selected haemodynamically stable patients with penetrating abdominal injury underwent AL. Suitability for AL was at the discretion of the attending surgeon. Identification of peritoneal penetration by AL led to exploratory laparotomy in the operating room. Patients with no evidence of peritoneal penetration were discharged from the ED (ALneg). These patients were matched to a cohort of 24 patients who underwent diagnostic laparoscopy in the OR which was negative for peritoneal penetration (DLneg). Length of stay and hospital charges were compared.

RESULTS

Over a 30-month period, 15 patients underwent AL without complication. No peritoneal penetration was found in 11 patients. The remaining four patients underwent exploratory laparotomy, of which two were positive for intra-abdominal injury. Mean time to discharge was 7h in the ALneg group versus 18 h in the DLneg group (p=0.0003). Cost savings on hospital charges averaged 2227 US dollars per patient in the ALneg group compared with the DLneg group.

CONCLUSIONS

AL may be safely performed in the ED, allowing for expedited patient discharge. Cost savings are achieved by the avoidance of charges inherent to diagnostic laparoscopy performed in the operating room.

摘要

背景

诊断性腹腔镜检查对于评估不明确的腹部穿透伤很有用,并且已成为我们机构评估此类伤口的首选方式。我们假设,对于合适的患者,可在急诊科(ED)在局部麻醉下进行诊断性“清醒”腹腔镜检查(AL),从而实现快速出院并可能节省费用。

方法

选择血流动力学稳定的腹部穿透伤患者进行AL。是否适合进行AL由主刀医生决定。通过AL确定有腹膜穿透则在手术室进行剖腹探查。没有腹膜穿透证据的患者从急诊科出院(AL阴性)。将这些患者与一组24例在手术室进行诊断性腹腔镜检查且腹膜穿透阴性的患者(DL阴性)进行匹配。比较住院时间和住院费用。

结果

在30个月的时间里,15例患者接受了AL,无并发症发生。11例患者未发现腹膜穿透。其余4例患者进行了剖腹探查,其中2例腹腔内损伤阳性。AL阴性组的平均出院时间为7小时,而DL阴性组为18小时(p = 0.0003)。与DL阴性组相比,AL阴性组每位患者的住院费用平均节省2227美元。

结论

在急诊科可以安全地进行AL,从而实现患者快速出院。通过避免在手术室进行诊断性腹腔镜检查所固有的费用实现了成本节约。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验