• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

穿透性躯干损伤的选择性管理:急诊科出院是一个合理的目标吗?

Selective management of penetrating truncal injuries: is emergency department discharge a reasonable goal?

作者信息

Conrad Mark F, Patton Joe H, Parikshak Manesh, Kralovich Kurt A

机构信息

Division of Trauma Surgery, Department of Surgery, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, Michigan, USA.

出版信息

Am Surg. 2003 Mar;69(3):266-72; discussion 273.

PMID:12678486
Abstract

We undertook this retrospective review to examine the appropriateness of a protocol for the selective emergency department (ED) workup of asymptomatic penetrating truncal injuries. Records of consecutive patients presenting to our urban Level I trauma center with penetrating truncal injuries between January 1, 1997 and September 2000 were reviewed. Data obtained included: patient demographics, ED workup, ED disposition, complications, and follow-up. Selective ED workup included hospital triple-contrast CT, admission for observation, and local wound exploration for selected anterior abdominal stab wounds. Four hundred fifty-five patients presented with penetrating truncal wounds during the study period. One hundred ninety-four patients were taken directly to the operating room, 136 were discharged based solely on physical examination and plain radiographs, 18 were admitted for observation without ED workup, and 107 had selective ED workup. Sixty-two patients (58% of those selectively worked up) were discharged home after negative ED workup, 18 were managed operatively, and 27 were managed nonoperatively. There were two missed injuries that were later identified and managed with no complications. Follow-up was available on 66 per cent of ED workup patients (range 1-42 months). We conclude that selective management of certain penetrating truncal injuries appears appropriate. Patients having a negative selective ED workup can be safely discharged thereby avoiding the cost and resource utilization associated with hospital admission.

摘要

我们进行了这项回顾性研究,以检验一项针对无症状穿透性躯干损伤的急诊科(ED)选择性检查方案的合理性。回顾了1997年1月1日至2000年9月期间连续入住我们城市一级创伤中心且有穿透性躯干损伤患者的记录。获取的数据包括:患者人口统计学信息、急诊科检查、急诊科处置、并发症及随访情况。选择性急诊科检查包括医院三重对比CT、入院观察以及对选定的前腹部刺伤进行局部伤口探查。在研究期间,有455例患者出现穿透性躯干伤口。194例患者直接被送往手术室,136例仅根据体格检查和X线平片就出院了,18例未经急诊科检查就入院观察,107例接受了选择性急诊科检查。62例患者(接受选择性检查患者中的58%)在急诊科检查结果为阴性后出院回家,18例接受了手术治疗,27例接受了非手术治疗。有2例漏诊损伤后来被发现并得到处理,未出现并发症。对66%接受急诊科检查的患者进行了随访(随访时间为1 - 42个月)。我们得出结论,对某些穿透性躯干损伤进行选择性处理似乎是合理的。接受选择性急诊科检查结果为阴性的患者可以安全出院,从而避免与住院相关的费用和资源利用。

相似文献

1
Selective management of penetrating truncal injuries: is emergency department discharge a reasonable goal?穿透性躯干损伤的选择性管理:急诊科出院是一个合理的目标吗?
Am Surg. 2003 Mar;69(3):266-72; discussion 273.
2
Non-operative management of abdominal stab wounds--an analysis of 186 patients.腹部刺伤的非手术治疗——186例患者的分析
S Afr J Surg. 2007 Nov;45(4):128-30, 132.
3
"Awake" laparoscopy for the evaluation of equivocal penetrating abdominal wounds.“清醒”腹腔镜检查用于评估可疑的腹部穿透伤。
Injury. 2007 Jan;38(1):60-4. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2006.08.061. Epub 2006 Nov 28.
4
An audit of failed non-operative management of abdominal stab wounds.腹部锐器伤非手术治疗失败的审核。
Injury. 2010 May;41(5):488-91. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2009.10.022. Epub 2009 Nov 12.
5
Management of haemodynamically stable patients with abdominal stab wounds.血流动力学稳定的腹部刺伤患者的处理
Emerg Med Australas. 2007 Jun;19(3):269-75. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-6723.2007.00965.x.
6
Diagnostic laparotomy for abdominal trauma. A university hospital experience.腹部创伤的诊断性剖腹术。一所大学医院的经验。
Am Surg. 1986 Jan;52(1):41-3.
7
Survival after emergency department versus operating room thoracotomy for penetrating cardiac injuries.急诊室开胸手术与手术室开胸手术治疗穿透性心脏损伤后的生存率比较。
Am Surg. 1992 Jun;58(6):329-32; discussion 332-3.
8
Diagnostic laparoscopy after anterior abdominal stab wounds: worth another look?腹部前刺伤后行诊断性腹腔镜检查:值得再看一眼吗?
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2013 Dec;75(6):1013-7; discussion 1017-8. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3182a1fde8.
9
Assessing the severity of truncal gunshot wounds: a nation-wide analysis from Finland.
Ann Chir Gynaecol. 2001;90(4):246-51.
10
Management of patients with anterior abdominal stab wounds: a Western Trauma Association multicenter trial.前腹部刺伤患者的管理:一项西部创伤协会多中心试验
J Trauma. 2009 May;66(5):1294-301. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e31819dc688.

引用本文的文献

1
Diagnostic Accuracy of Abdominal wall Ultrasonography and Local Wound Exploration in Predicting the Need for Laparotomy following Stab Wound.腹壁超声检查和局部伤口探查对预测刺伤后剖腹手术需求的诊断准确性
Emerg (Tehran). 2017;5(1):e34. Epub 2017 Jan 11.
2
Selective versus comprehensive emergency management in Korea.韩国的选择性应急管理与全面应急管理
Springerplus. 2014 Oct 15;3:602. doi: 10.1186/2193-1801-3-602. eCollection 2014.
3
Abdominal gunshot wounds: multi-detector-row CT findings compared with laparotomy: a prospective study.
Emerg Radiol. 2012 Jan;19(1):35-41. doi: 10.1007/s10140-011-1004-1. Epub 2011 Dec 2.