Suppr超能文献

不孕保险授权对生育的影响。

Effects of infertility insurance mandates on fertility.

作者信息

Schmidt Lucie

机构信息

Department of Economics, Morey House, Williams College, Williamstown, MA 01267, USA.

出版信息

J Health Econ. 2007 May 1;26(3):431-46. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2006.10.012. Epub 2006 Nov 28.

Abstract

Infertility currently affects over 6 million individuals in the United States. While most health insurance plans nationwide do not cover infertility diagnoses or treatments, to date 15 states have enacted some form of infertility insurance mandate. In this paper, I use data from the Vital Statistics Detail Natality Data and Census population estimates to examine whether these state-level mandates were successful in increasing fertility rates. Using a difference-in-differences approach, I exploit variation in the enactment of mandates both across states and over time, and identify treatment and control groups that should have been differentially affected by infertility coverage. My results suggest that the mandates significantly increase first birth rates for women over 35, and these results are robust to a number of specification tests.

摘要

目前,美国有超过600万人受不孕症影响。虽然全国大多数医疗保险计划都不涵盖不孕症的诊断或治疗,但迄今为止,已有15个州颁布了某种形式的不孕症保险授权法案。在本文中,我使用来自生命统计详细出生数据和人口普查人口估计的数据,来研究这些州一级的授权法案是否成功提高了生育率。我采用双重差分法,利用各州之间以及不同时间颁布授权法案的差异,确定了应该受到不孕症保险覆盖差异影响的治疗组和对照组。我的结果表明,这些授权法案显著提高了35岁以上女性的初育率,并且这些结果在许多规格检验中都是稳健的。

相似文献

1
Effects of infertility insurance mandates on fertility.
J Health Econ. 2007 May 1;26(3):431-46. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2006.10.012. Epub 2006 Nov 28.
2
State insurance mandates and racial and ethnic inequities in assisted reproductive technology utilization.
Fertil Steril. 2024 Jan;121(1):54-62. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2023.09.015. Epub 2023 Sep 28.
3
US State-Level Infertility Insurance Mandates and Health Plan Expenditures on Infertility Treatments.
Matern Child Health J. 2019 May;23(5):623-632. doi: 10.1007/s10995-018-2675-y.
4
Utilization of infertility treatments: the effects of insurance mandates.
Demography. 2012 Feb;49(1):125-49. doi: 10.1007/s13524-011-0078-4.
6
Fertility-a human right worthy of mandated insurance coverage: the evolution, limitations, and future of access to care.
Fertil Steril. 2021 Jan;115(1):29-42. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2020.09.155. Epub 2020 Dec 18.
9
10
Infertility insurance mandates and multiple births.
Health Econ. 2013 Jul;22(7):775-89. doi: 10.1002/hec.2850. Epub 2012 Jun 13.

引用本文的文献

1
Determinants of utilization of infertility services by race and ethnicity in a state with a comprehensive infertility mandate.
Fertil Steril. 2025 Apr;123(4):709-717. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2024.10.036. Epub 2024 Oct 31.
2
The relationship between socioeconomic status and perinatal outcomes in in vitro fertilization conceptions.
AJOG Glob Rep. 2024 Feb 23;4(2):100329. doi: 10.1016/j.xagr.2024.100329. eCollection 2024 May.
4
State insurance mandates and racial and ethnic inequities in assisted reproductive technology utilization.
Fertil Steril. 2024 Jan;121(1):54-62. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2023.09.015. Epub 2023 Sep 28.
5
Evaluation of Assisted Reproductive Technology Health Insurance Coverage for Multiple Pregnancies and Births in Korea.
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Jun 1;6(6):e2316696. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.16696.
6
In vitro fertilization: a cross-sectional analysis of 58 US insurance companies.
J Assist Reprod Genet. 2023 Mar;40(3):581-587. doi: 10.1007/s10815-022-02697-5. Epub 2022 Dec 21.
7
Geographic distribution of assisted reproductive technology clinics in the USA: a multilevel sociodemographic analysis.
J Assist Reprod Genet. 2022 Nov;39(11):2505-2519. doi: 10.1007/s10815-022-02607-9. Epub 2022 Sep 14.
8
Psychobiological, clinical, and sociocultural factors that influence Black women seeking treatment for infertility: a mixed-methods study.
F S Rep. 2022 Feb 22;3(2 Suppl):29-39. doi: 10.1016/j.xfre.2022.02.004. eCollection 2022 May.
10
A comparison of methods for health policy evaluation with controlled pre-post designs.
Health Serv Res. 2020 Apr;55(2):328-338. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13274. Epub 2020 Feb 12.

本文引用的文献

1
Infertility Insurance Mandates and Fertility.
Am Econ Rev. 2005 May;95(2):204-8. doi: 10.1257/000282805774670086.
2
Health disparities and infertility: impacts of state-level insurance mandates.
Fertil Steril. 2006 Apr;85(4):858-65. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2005.11.038.
3
Disparities in access to infertility services in a state with mandated insurance coverage.
Fertil Steril. 2005 Jul;84(1):221-3. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2005.01.118.
6
Self-insurance in times of growing and retreating managed care.
Health Aff (Millwood). 2003 Mar-Apr;22(2):202-10. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.22.2.202.
7
Insurance coverage and outcomes of in vitro fertilization.
N Engl J Med. 2002 Aug 29;347(9):661-6. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa013491.
8
Prevalence of employer self-insured health benefits: national and state variation.
Med Care Res Rev. 2000 Sep;57(3):340-60. doi: 10.1177/107755870005700305.
9
Use of infertility services in the United States: 1995.
Fam Plann Perspect. 2000 May-Jun;32(3):132-7.
10
Mental health parity legislation: much ado about nothing?
Health Serv Res. 2000 Apr;35(1 Pt 2):263-75.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验