Cardon James H, Showalter Mark H
Department of Economics, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT 84602, USA.
J Health Econ. 2007 Mar 1;26(2):373-99. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2006.10.010. Epub 2006 Nov 28.
We develop an infinite horizon utility maximization model of the interaction between insurance choice and tax-preferred health savings accounts. The model can be used to examine a wide range of policy options, including flexible spending accounts, health savings accounts, and health reimbursement accounts. We also develop a 2-period model to simulate various implications of the model. Key results from the simulation analysis include the following: (1) with no adverse selection, use of unrestricted health savings accounts leads to modest welfare gains, after accounting for the tax revenue loss; (2) with adverse selection and an initial pooling equilibrium comprised of "sick" and "healthy" consumers, introducing HSAs can, but does not necessarily, lead to a new pooling equilibrium. The new equilibrium results in a higher coinsurance rate, an increase in expected utility for healthy consumers, and a decrease in expected utility for sick consumers; (3) with adverse selection and a separating equilibrium, both sick and healthy consumers are better off with a health savings account; (4) efficiency gains are possible when insurance contracts are explicitly linked to tax-preferred health savings accounts.
我们构建了一个无限期效用最大化模型,用于研究保险选择与税收优惠型健康储蓄账户之间的相互作用。该模型可用于考察一系列政策选项,包括灵活支出账户、健康储蓄账户和健康报销账户。我们还构建了一个两期模型来模拟该模型的各种影响。模拟分析的主要结果如下:(1)在不存在逆向选择的情况下,在考虑税收收入损失后,使用无限制的健康储蓄账户会带来适度的福利增加;(2)在存在逆向选择且初始集合均衡由“患病”和“健康”消费者组成的情况下,引入健康储蓄账户可能但不一定会导致新的集合均衡。新的均衡会导致更高的共保率,健康消费者的预期效用增加,患病消费者的预期效用降低;(3)在存在逆向选择且为分离均衡的情况下,患病和健康消费者使用健康储蓄账户都会过得更好;(4)当保险合同与税收优惠型健康储蓄账户明确挂钩时,有可能实现效率提升。