Suppr超能文献

行动还是无为?基层医疗中糖尿病和血压升高患者的决策制定

Action or inaction? Decision making in patients with diabetes and elevated blood pressure in primary care.

作者信息

Hicks Paul C, Westfall John M, Van Vorst Rebecca F, Bublitz Emsermann Caroline, Dickinson L Miriam, Pace Wilson, Parnes Bennett

机构信息

Salud Family Health Center, 1115 Second St., Fort Lupton, CO 80621, USA.

出版信息

Diabetes Care. 2006 Dec;29(12):2580-5. doi: 10.2337/dc06-1124.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Hypertension increases micro- and macrovascular complications of diabetes. The goal for blood pressure is <130/80 mmHg. In primary care, however, blood pressure in many patients exceeds this goal. In this study, we evaluated the clinical decision-making process when a patient with diabetes presents with elevated blood pressure.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

Twenty-six primary care practices in two practice-based research networks in Colorado participated. Questionnaires were completed after each encounter with an adult with type 2 diabetes. Data obtained from the survey included 1) demographic information, 2) blood pressure results, 3) action taken, 4) type of action if action was taken, and 5) reasons for inaction if action was not taken. Bivariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify predictors of action.

RESULTS

Completed surveys totaled 778. Blood pressure was 130/74 +/- 18.8/12.0 mmHg (mean +/- SD). Sixty-two percent of patients exceeded goals. Action was taken to lower blood pressure in 34.9% of those. Predictors of action were 1) blood pressure level, 2) total number of medicines the patient was taking, and 3) patient already taking medicines for blood pressure. As blood pressure rose, providers attributed inaction more often to "competing demands" and reasons other than "blood pressure being at or near goal."

CONCLUSIONS

No evidence was found for patterns of poor care among primary care physicians. Providers balance the clinical circumstances, including how elevated the blood pressure is, and issues of polypharmacy, medication side effects, and costs when determining the best course of action. Knowledge deficit is not a common cause of inaction.

摘要

目的

高血压会增加糖尿病的微血管和大血管并发症。血压目标为<130/80 mmHg。然而,在初级保健中,许多患者的血压超过了这个目标。在本研究中,我们评估了糖尿病患者血压升高时的临床决策过程。

研究设计与方法

科罗拉多州两个基于实践的研究网络中的26个初级保健机构参与了研究。每次与成年2型糖尿病患者接触后完成问卷调查。从调查中获得的数据包括:1)人口统计学信息,2)血压结果,3)采取的行动,4)如果采取行动则为行动类型,以及5)如果未采取行动则为未采取行动的原因。进行双变量和多变量分析以确定行动的预测因素。

结果

共完成778份调查问卷。血压为130/74 +/- 18.8/12.0 mmHg(平均值 +/- 标准差)。62%的患者超过了目标值。其中34.9%的患者采取了降低血压的行动。行动的预测因素为:1)血压水平,2)患者正在服用的药物总数,以及3)患者已经在服用降压药。随着血压升高,医疗服务提供者将未采取行动更多地归因于“相互竞争的需求”以及“血压处于或接近目标值”以外的原因。

结论

未发现初级保健医生存在护理不佳模式的证据。医疗服务提供者在确定最佳行动方案时会权衡临床情况,包括血压升高的程度以及多药治疗、药物副作用和成本等问题。知识不足并非未采取行动的常见原因。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验