Suppr超能文献

科罗拉多州东北部城乡基层医疗诊所糖尿病患者高血压管理情况比较——来自SNOCAP的报告

Comparison of HTN management in patients with diabetes between rural and urban primary care clinics in Northeastern Colorado - a report from SNOCAP.

作者信息

Hicks P C, Bublitz Emsermann C, Westfall J M, Parnes B

机构信息

Department of Family and Community Medicine, The University of Arizona, Arizona Health Sciences Center, Tucson, Arizona, USA.

出版信息

Rural Remote Health. 2010 Jan-Mar;10(1):1279. Epub 2010 Feb 12.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

In the USA, rural residents have a higher burden of disease and more limited access to care than urban residents. There are conflicting data on quality of care in rural settings. To evaluate this relationship, blood pressure (BP) control and decision-making at the point of care in patients with diabetes were examined for rural and urban medical providers in Northeastern Colorado.

METHODS

Twenty-six primary care practices in two practice-based research networks in Colorado participated: 13 in rural settings and 13 urban. Questionnaires were completed after each encounter with an adult with type 2 diabetes. The survey obtained: (1) demographic information; (2) BP result; (3) whether action was taken; (4) if action was taken, type of action; and (5) if no action, what reasons were given for this inaction. Bivariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify predictors of action.

RESULTS

In total, 778 surveys were completed. Mean BP was 130/74 (+/-18.8/12.0) with BP in rural residents being slightly lower than for urban residents. Rural residents were more likely to be non-Hispanic white, on Medicare, on multiple medications, and less likely to be on Medicaid. Sixty-five percent of urban patients exceeded BP goals, as did 58% of rural patients. Action rates for those with elevated BP in rural areas were not significantly different than those in urban areas (OR 0.75 [0.45-1.25] p = 0.27). The reasons for inaction were similar.

CONCLUSION

In this study of patients with diabetes, quality of care for elevated BP was similar in rural and urban areas.

摘要

引言

在美国,农村居民比城市居民承担着更高的疾病负担,获得医疗服务的机会也更为有限。关于农村地区医疗服务质量的数据存在矛盾。为了评估这种关系,我们对科罗拉多州东北部农村和城市的医疗服务提供者在糖尿病患者护理过程中的血压控制和决策情况进行了研究。

方法

科罗拉多州两个基于实践的研究网络中的26家初级保健机构参与了研究:13家位于农村地区,13家位于城市地区。在每次接诊成年2型糖尿病患者后,完成问卷调查。该调查获取了以下信息:(1)人口统计学信息;(2)血压结果;(3)是否采取了行动;(4)如果采取了行动,行动的类型;(5)如果未采取行动,未采取行动的原因。进行了双变量和多变量分析以确定行动的预测因素。

结果

总共完成了778份调查问卷。平均血压为130/74(±18.8/12.0),农村居民的血压略低于城市居民。农村居民更有可能是非西班牙裔白人、参加医疗保险、服用多种药物,而参加医疗补助计划的可能性较小。65%的城市患者血压超过目标值,农村患者的这一比例为58%。农村地区血压升高患者的行动率与城市地区没有显著差异(比值比0.75[0.45 - 1.25],p = 0.27)。未采取行动的原因相似。

结论

在这项对糖尿病患者的研究中,农村和城市地区高血压的护理质量相似。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验