Tsuchiya Naotsugu, Koch Christof, Gilroy Lee A, Blake Randolph
Division of Humanities and Social Sciences, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, USA.
J Vis. 2006 Sep 21;6(10):1068-78. doi: 10.1167/6.10.6.
When conflicting images are presented to the corresponding regions of the two eyes, only one image may be consciously perceived. In binocular rivalry (BR), two images alternate in phenomenal visibility; even a salient image is eventually suppressed by an image of low saliency. Recently, N. Tsuchiya and C. Koch (2005) reported a technique called continuous flash suppression (CFS), extending the suppression duration more than 10-fold. Here, we investigated the depth of this prolonged form of interocular suppression as well as conventional BR and flash suppression (FS) using a probe detection task. Compared to monocular viewing condition, CFS elevated detection thresholds more than 20-fold, whereas BR did so by 3-fold. In subsequent experiments, we dissected CFS into several components. By manipulating the number and timing of flashes with respect to the probe, we found that the stronger suppression in CFS is not due to summation between BR and FS but is caused by the summation of the suppression due to multiple flashes. Our results support the view that CFS is not a stronger version of BR but is due to the accumulated suppressive effects of multiple flashes.
当向双眼的相应区域呈现相互冲突的图像时,可能只有一幅图像能被有意识地感知到。在双眼竞争(BR)中,两幅图像在现象可见性上交替出现;即使是一幅显著的图像最终也会被一幅低显著性的图像所抑制。最近,N. 土屋和C. 科赫(2005年)报告了一种称为连续闪光抑制(CFS)的技术,将抑制持续时间延长了10倍以上。在这里,我们使用探针检测任务研究了这种延长形式的眼间抑制以及传统的BR和闪光抑制(FS)的深度。与单眼观看条件相比,CFS将检测阈值提高了20倍以上,而BR则提高了3倍。在随后的实验中,我们将CFS分解为几个成分。通过操纵相对于探针的闪光次数和时间,我们发现CFS中更强的抑制不是由于BR和FS之间的叠加,而是由多次闪光引起的抑制叠加所致。我们的结果支持这样一种观点,即CFS不是BR的更强版本,而是由于多次闪光的累积抑制作用。