• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

双眼抑制刺激会诱发与审美情绪相关的大脑活动。

Binocularly suppressed stimuli induce brain activities related to aesthetic emotions.

作者信息

Hoshi Hideyuki, Ishii Akira, Shigihara Yoshihito, Yoshikawa Takahiro

机构信息

Department of Sports Medicine, Osaka Metropolitan University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.

Precision Medicine Centre, Hokuto Hospital, Obihiro, Japan.

出版信息

Front Neurosci. 2024 May 24;18:1339479. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2024.1339479. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.3389/fnins.2024.1339479
PMID:38855441
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11159128/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Aesthetic emotions are a class of emotions aroused by evaluating aesthetically appealing objects or events. While evolutionary aesthetics suggests the adaptive roles of these emotions, empirical assessments are lacking. Previous neuroscientific studies have demonstrated that visual stimuli carrying evolutionarily important information induce neural responses even when presented non-consciously. To examine the evolutionary importance of aesthetic emotions, we conducted a neuroscientific study using magnetoencephalography (MEG) to measure induced neural responses to non-consciously presented portrait paintings categorised as biological and non-biological and examined associations between the induced responses and aesthetic ratings.

METHODS

MEG and pre-rating data were collected from 23 participants. The pre-rating included visual analogue scales for , , , and scores, in addition to ',' which was used for subcategorising stimuli into biological and non-biological. The stimuli were presented non-consciously using a continuous flash suppression paradigm or consciously using binocular presentation without flashing masks, while dichotomic behavioural responses were obtained (beauty or non-beauty). Time-frequency decomposed MEG data were used for correlation analysis with pre-rating scores for each category.

RESULTS

Behavioural data revealed that saliency scores of non-consciously presented stimuli influenced dichotomic responses (beauty or non-beauty). MEG data showed that non-consciously presented portrait paintings induced spatiotemporally distributed low-frequency brain activities associated with aesthetic ratings, which were distinct between the biological and non-biological categories and conscious and non-conscious conditions.

CONCLUSION

Aesthetic emotion holds evolutionary significance for humans. Neural pathways are sensitive to visual images that arouse aesthetic emotion in distinct ways for biological and non-biological categories, which are further influenced by consciousness. These differences likely reflect the diversity in mechanisms of aesthetic processing, such as processing fluency, active elaboration, and predictive processing. The aesthetic processing of non-conscious stimuli appears to be characterised by fluency-driven affective processing, while top-down regulatory processes are suppressed. This study provides the first empirical evidence supporting the evolutionary significance of aesthetic processing.

摘要

引言

审美情感是一类由对具有审美吸引力的物体或事件进行评估而引发的情感。虽然进化美学提出了这些情感的适应性作用,但缺乏实证评估。先前的神经科学研究表明,携带进化重要信息的视觉刺激即使在无意识呈现时也会诱发神经反应。为了检验审美情感的进化重要性,我们进行了一项神经科学研究,使用脑磁图(MEG)来测量对无意识呈现的、分类为生物和非生物的肖像画诱发的神经反应,并研究诱发反应与审美评分之间的关联。

方法

从23名参与者收集了MEG和预评分数据。预评分除了用于将刺激细分为生物和非生物的“生物/非生物”外,还包括视觉模拟量表用于愉悦度、唤醒度、支配度和复杂度评分。刺激通过连续闪光抑制范式无意识呈现,或通过无闪光掩模的双眼呈现有意识呈现,同时获得二分行为反应(美或不美)。时频分解的MEG数据用于与每个类别的预评分进行相关分析。

结果

行为数据表明,无意识呈现刺激的显著性评分影响二分反应(美或不美)。MEG数据显示,无意识呈现的肖像画诱发了与审美评分相关的时空分布低频脑活动,这在生物和非生物类别以及有意识和无意识条件之间是不同的。

结论

审美情感对人类具有进化意义。神经通路对以不同方式唤起生物和非生物类别的审美情感的视觉图像敏感,并且这些图像还受到意识的进一步影响。这些差异可能反映了审美加工机制的多样性,如加工流畅性、主动阐释和预测加工。无意识刺激的审美加工似乎以流畅性驱动的情感加工为特征,而自上而下的调节过程受到抑制。本研究提供了支持审美加工进化意义的首个实证证据。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4715/11159128/a9b8f8ee416b/fnins-18-1339479-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4715/11159128/03e5ee48e0d4/fnins-18-1339479-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4715/11159128/a97091e2b3b4/fnins-18-1339479-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4715/11159128/4fe290dd141f/fnins-18-1339479-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4715/11159128/a9b8f8ee416b/fnins-18-1339479-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4715/11159128/03e5ee48e0d4/fnins-18-1339479-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4715/11159128/a97091e2b3b4/fnins-18-1339479-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4715/11159128/4fe290dd141f/fnins-18-1339479-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4715/11159128/a9b8f8ee416b/fnins-18-1339479-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Binocularly suppressed stimuli induce brain activities related to aesthetic emotions.双眼抑制刺激会诱发与审美情绪相关的大脑活动。
Front Neurosci. 2024 May 24;18:1339479. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2024.1339479. eCollection 2024.
2
Subliminal presentation of emotionally negative vs positive primes increases the perceived beauty of target stimuli.潜意识呈现情绪消极与积极的启动刺激会增加目标刺激的感知美感。
Exp Brain Res. 2015 Nov;233(11):3271-81. doi: 10.1007/s00221-015-4395-5. Epub 2015 Aug 4.
3
The impact of crossmodal predictions on the neural processing of aesthetic stimuli.跨模态预测对审美刺激的神经加工的影响。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2024 Jan 29;379(1895):20220418. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2022.0418. Epub 2023 Dec 18.
4
Temporal neural mechanisms underlying conscious access to different levels of facial stimulus contents.有意识地获取不同层次面部刺激内容背后的颞叶神经机制。
J Neurophysiol. 2018 Apr 1;119(4):1356-1366. doi: 10.1152/jn.00747.2017. Epub 2017 Dec 20.
5
The differential power of extraneous influences to modify aesthetic judgments of biological and artifactual stimuli.外在影响对修改对生物和人工刺激的审美判断的差异作用。
Psych J. 2021 Apr;10(2):190-199. doi: 10.1002/pchj.415. Epub 2020 Dec 8.
6
Does beauty capture the eye, even if it's not (overtly) adaptive? A comparative eye-tracking study of spontaneous attention and visual preference with VAST abstract art.美是否能吸引眼球,即使它不是(明显)适应的?VAST 抽象艺术的自发性注意和视觉偏好的比较眼动研究。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2020 Sep;209:103133. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2020.103133. Epub 2020 Jul 24.
7
Spectral brain signatures of aesthetic natural perception in the α and β frequency bands.α 和 β 频段中审美自然感知的频谱脑特征。
J Neurophysiol. 2022 Dec 1;128(6):1501-1505. doi: 10.1152/jn.00385.2022. Epub 2022 Oct 19.
8
Neural correlates for aesthetic appraisal of pictograph and its referent: An fMRI study.象形文字及其指代物审美评价的神经关联:一项功能磁共振成像研究。
Behav Brain Res. 2016 May 15;305:229-38. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2016.02.029. Epub 2016 Mar 4.
9
The neural determinants of abstract beauty.抽象美的神经决定因素。
Eur J Neurosci. 2023 Feb;57(4):633-645. doi: 10.1111/ejn.15912. Epub 2023 Jan 20.
10
Interruption, work rumination, and stress as indicators of reduced working memory resources affect aesthetic experiences.中断、工作反刍和压力作为工作记忆资源减少的指标,会影响审美体验。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2022 Jul;75(7):1272-1288. doi: 10.1177/17470218211050194. Epub 2021 Oct 20.

本文引用的文献

1
Oscillatory characteristics of resting-state magnetoencephalography reflect pathological and symptomatic conditions of cognitive impairment.静息态脑磁图的振荡特征反映了认知障碍的病理和症状情况。
Front Aging Neurosci. 2024 Jan 30;16:1273738. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2024.1273738. eCollection 2024.
2
Fluency, prediction and motivation: how processing dynamics, expectations and epistemic goals shape aesthetic judgements.流畅度、预测和动机:处理动态、期望和认识目标如何塑造审美判断。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2024 Jan 29;379(1895):20230326. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2023.0326. Epub 2023 Dec 18.
3
Order and change in art: towards an active inference account of aesthetic experience.
艺术中的秩序与变化:走向审美体验的主动推理解释
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2024 Jan 29;379(1895):20220411. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2022.0411. Epub 2023 Dec 18.
4
Aesthetics and predictive processing: grounds and prospects of a fruitful encounter.美学与预测加工:富有成效的相遇的基础和前景。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2024 Jan 29;379(1895):20220410. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2022.0410. Epub 2023 Dec 18.
5
Relative fluency (unfelt vs felt) in active inference.主动推断中的相对流畅性(未感觉到的与感觉到的)。
Conscious Cogn. 2023 Oct;115:103579. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2023.103579. Epub 2023 Sep 28.
6
Aesthetic experience models human learning.审美体验塑造人类学习。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2023 May 2;17:1146083. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2023.1146083. eCollection 2023.
7
Understanding the mechanisms underlying the other-'race' effect: An attempt at integrating different perspectives.理解“异族效应”背后的机制:整合不同视角的尝试。
Br J Psychol. 2023 May;114 Suppl 1:1-9. doi: 10.1111/bjop.12615. Epub 2022 Dec 30.
8
Error-related brain activity: A time-domain and time-frequency investigation in pediatric obsessive-compulsive disorder.与错误相关的脑活动:小儿强迫症的时域和时频研究
Psychophysiology. 2023 Apr;60(4):e14216. doi: 10.1111/psyp.14216. Epub 2022 Nov 4.
9
Subliminal Emotional Faces Elicit Predominantly Right-Lateralized Amygdala Activation: A Systematic Meta-Analysis of fMRI Studies.阈下情绪面孔主要引发杏仁核右侧化激活:功能磁共振成像研究的系统荟萃分析
Front Neurosci. 2022 Jul 18;16:868366. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2022.868366. eCollection 2022.
10
Neuroscientific Evidence for Processing Without Awareness.神经科学对无意识加工的证据。
Annu Rev Neurosci. 2022 Jul 8;45:403-423. doi: 10.1146/annurev-neuro-110920-033151.