Dzikiti T B, Joubert K E, Venter L J, Dzikiti L N
Department of Companion Animal Clinical Studies, Faculty of Veterinary Science, University of Pretoria, Private Bag X04, Onderstepoort, 0110 South Africa.
J S Afr Vet Assoc. 2006 Sep;77(3):120-6. doi: 10.4102/jsava.v77i3.358.
In this study the analgesic efficacy of the pure agonistic opioid morphine and the cyclo-oxygenase type-2-selective carprofen were compared since there is no previous specific comparative study for these two common analgesics. Forty-five bitches undergoing elective ovariohysterectomy were randomly assigned to one of three groups; receiving morphine 0.4 mg/kg bodyweight pre-operatively and 0.2 mg/kg every 4-6 hours thereafter (Morphine group), receiving a once-off carprofen 4 mg/kg injection (Carprofen group) or receiving both morphine and carprofen (MorphCarp group). The dogs were premedicated with acepromazine 0.01 mg/kg and induced with either thiopentone 5-10 mg/kg or propofol 4-6 mg/kg. General anaesthesia was maintained with halothane in oxygen. The degree of pain was assessed over a 24-hour period under blinded conditions using a pain scale modified from the University of Melbourne pain scale and the Glasgow composite pain tool. Physiological parameters such as respiratory rate, pulse rate and body temperature were also assessed over the same time period. There was no significant difference in pain-scores and thus analgesia offered by the three analgesia protocols at any assessment point across the three groups, but there were differences within groups across time points. Baseline total pain-scores were lower than scores at all post-operative points within all three groups. Both morphine and carprofen provided good analgesia without any obvious adverse effects. This study indicates that at the dosages indicated above, carprofen administered on its own produces analgesia equal to that produced by morphine and that the two drugs administered together do not produce better analgesia than either drug administered on its own.
由于此前尚无针对这两种常用镇痛药的具体对比研究,本研究对纯激动剂阿片类药物吗啡和环氧化酶-2选择性药物卡洛芬的镇痛效果进行了比较。45只接受择期卵巢子宫切除术的母犬被随机分为三组;术前接受0.4mg/kg体重的吗啡,此后每4-6小时接受0.2mg/kg(吗啡组);接受一次4mg/kg的卡洛芬注射(卡洛芬组);或同时接受吗啡和卡洛芬(吗啡卡洛芬组)。犬只术前用0.01mg/kg的乙酰丙嗪进行预处理,并用5-10mg/kg的硫喷妥钠或4-6mg/kg的丙泊酚诱导麻醉。使用氧气中的氟烷维持全身麻醉。在盲法条件下,使用从墨尔本大学疼痛量表和格拉斯哥综合疼痛工具修改而来的疼痛量表,在24小时内评估疼痛程度。在同一时间段内还评估了呼吸频率、脉搏率和体温等生理参数。三组在任何评估点的疼痛评分以及由此提供的镇痛效果均无显著差异,但各时间点组内存在差异。所有三组的基线总疼痛评分均低于所有术后时间点的评分。吗啡和卡洛芬均提供了良好的镇痛效果,且无明显不良反应。本研究表明,按上述剂量单独使用卡洛芬产生的镇痛效果与吗啡相当,且两种药物联合使用并不比单独使用任何一种药物产生更好的镇痛效果。