Suppr超能文献

甲银屑病严重程度指数的观察者间可靠性

Interobserver reliability of the Nail Psoriasis Severity Index.

作者信息

Aktan S, Ilknur T, Akin C, Ozkan S

机构信息

Department Of Dermatology, Dokuz Eylül University School of Medicine, Izmir, Turkey.

出版信息

Clin Exp Dermatol. 2007 Mar;32(2):141-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2230.2006.02305.x. Epub 2006 Nov 27.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Because the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) does not consider the severity of nail disease, a scale that assesses the extent of involvement of psoriatic nails is needed. A new grading system, the Nail Psoriasis Severity Index (NAPSI) has been proposed.

AIMS

The purpose of this study was to assess the interobserver reliability of NAPSI. Methods. The nail features of 25 patients with psoriasis with nail involvement were evaluated and graded by three dermatologists for total NAPSI scores and nail scores. The quadrants of all nails were examined for the presence of matrix and bed features. Total NAPSI score (0-160) of patients and nail score (0-32) of the individual nails were calculated. Interobserver reliability assessments were performed by computing intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC; two-way mixed model, consistency definition).

RESULTS

The ICC((3,1)) results for total NAPSI score and nail score were found to be 0.781 and 0.649, respectively. The ICC((3,1)) for nail-bed and nail-matrix features were 0.869 and 0.584, respectively, in the total NAPSI scoring system, and 0.705 and 0.603, respectively, in the nail scoring system.

CONCLUSION

Moderate to good agreement of scoring with the NAPSI was determined among the observers in this study. Our results suggest that scoring for nail-bed features seems to be more reliable than scoring for nail-matrix features.

摘要

背景

由于银屑病面积和严重程度指数(PASI)未考虑甲病的严重程度,因此需要一种评估银屑病甲受累程度的量表。一种新的分级系统——甲银屑病严重程度指数(NAPSI)已被提出。

目的

本研究的目的是评估NAPSI的观察者间信度。方法。对25例有甲受累的银屑病患者的甲特征进行评估,并由三位皮肤科医生对总NAPSI评分和甲评分进行分级。检查所有指甲的象限,以确定是否存在甲母质和甲床特征。计算患者的总NAPSI评分(0 - 160)和单个指甲的甲评分(0 - 32)。通过计算组内相关系数(ICC;双向混合模型,一致性定义)进行观察者间信度评估。

结果

总NAPSI评分和甲评分的ICC((3,1))结果分别为0.781和0.649。在总NAPSI评分系统中,甲床和甲母质特征的ICC((3,1))分别为0.869和0.584,在甲评分系统中分别为0.705和0.603。

结论

本研究中观察者之间对NAPSI评分的一致性为中度到良好。我们的结果表明,甲床特征评分似乎比甲母质特征评分更可靠。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验