Solheim Nina, Rosseland Leiv Arne, Stubhaug Audun
Department of Anesthesiology, Lovisenberg Diakonale Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2006 Nov-Dec;31(6):506-13. doi: 10.1016/j.rapm.2006.06.206.
Intra-articular (IA) morphine for postoperative analgesia after knee arthroscopy is controversial. The IA catheter technique for test drug administration allows baseline pain assessment before inclusion. Results from one such randomized controlled trial (RCT) in patients with moderate to severe pain have shown equal effects of IA saline with or without morphine 2 mg. However, the IA catheter technique may have an unintended placebo effect. The aims of this placebo-controlled RCT were (1) to compare the analgesic effect of IA saline 1 mL (placebo) with morphine 5 mg given through an IA catheter and (2) to analyze the impact on pain of immediate or delayed removal of the IA catheter.
Sixty patients operated under general anesthesia had an IA catheter inserted at the end of arthroscopy. Patients who reported moderate or severe postoperative pain during the following hour were randomized to IA saline 1 mL (placebo) or IA morphine 5 mg and to immediate or delayed removal of IA catheter.
Forty of 60 patients (67%) developed moderate to severe pain within 1 hour. In addition, 5 patients experienced intolerable pain and were excluded. Significantly more women (24/26) than men (26/39) reported at least moderate pain (P = .018) during the first hour after surgery. There were no differences between IA morphine 5 mg and placebo in pain intensity or pain relief at any time during the 48-hour observation period. There was no detectable effect on pain intensity of early compared with late removal of the IA catheter.
IA morphine 5 mg does not produce clinically significant pain relief in patients with moderate or severe pain after knee arthroscopy.
关节腔内注射吗啡用于膝关节镜检查术后镇痛存在争议。通过关节腔导管技术给予试验药物,可在纳入研究前进行基线疼痛评估。一项针对中重度疼痛患者的随机对照试验结果显示,关节腔内注射含或不含2mg吗啡的生理盐水效果相同。然而,关节腔导管技术可能存在意外的安慰剂效应。本项安慰剂对照随机对照试验的目的是:(1)比较通过关节腔导管注射1mL生理盐水(安慰剂)与5mg吗啡的镇痛效果;(2)分析立即或延迟拔除关节腔导管对疼痛的影响。
60例在全身麻醉下接受手术的患者在关节镜检查结束时插入关节腔导管。在接下来的一小时内报告有中度或重度术后疼痛的患者被随机分为注射1mL关节腔生理盐水(安慰剂)或5mg关节腔吗啡组,并分为立即或延迟拔除关节腔导管组。
60例患者中有40例(67%)在1小时内出现中度至重度疼痛。此外,5例患者经历了无法忍受的疼痛并被排除。在术后第一小时,报告至少中度疼痛的女性(24/26)明显多于男性(26/39)(P = 0.018)。在48小时观察期内的任何时间,5mg关节腔吗啡组与安慰剂组在疼痛强度或疼痛缓解方面均无差异。与延迟拔除关节腔导管相比,早期拔除对疼痛强度没有可检测到的影响。
对于膝关节镜检查术后中重度疼痛的患者,关节腔内注射5mg吗啡并不能产生临床上显著的疼痛缓解。