• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

药物与治疗学委员会政策实施的观点。

Perspectives on Drug and Therapeutics Committee policy implementation.

作者信息

Tan Ee Lyn, Day Richard O, Brien Jo-anne E

机构信息

Faculty of Pharmacy, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.

出版信息

Res Social Adm Pharm. 2005 Dec;1(4):526-45. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2005.09.001.

DOI:10.1016/j.sapharm.2005.09.001
PMID:17138494
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Drug and therapeutics committees (DTCs) are expected to make difficult decisions that may have an impact on the clinical and economic outcomes of drug use. There have been few studies investigating the barriers to DTC policy implementation, and little is known about ways to improve the process.

OBJECTIVES

The specific objectives of this qualitative study were to explore stakeholder opinions with respect to (1) the perceptions of barriers to Drug and Therapeutics Committee (DTC) policy implementation and (2) ways to improve DTC policy implementation.

METHODS

Stakeholders of Australian DTCs participated in focus group discussions. Discussions were audiotaped and transcribed verbatim. Thematic content analysis was conducted.

RESULTS

Six focus group discussions were conducted. A number of barriers were identified (lack of resources, lack of follow-up, lack of ownership, low DTC profile within the organization, and overreliance on pharmacy to implement policy). Participants were of the opinion that prioritizing decisions, optimizing pharmacy roles, provision of real-time information, and active procurement of organizational commitment were some of the ways to improve DTC policy implementation.

CONCLUSIONS

Although this study was conducted in an Australian setting, the challenges facing DTCs in other countries are likely to be similar. Ownership, social influence, and resources are important issues in the implementation of policy/guidelines for many DTCs, both in Australia and internationally. It is expected that these issues will have an impact on policy implementation. Therefore, the findings of this study may be widely applicable. This work reinforced the notion that the significance of DTCs lies beyond decision making alone. The time and expertise invested in decision making could be undermined, if DTC policies are not effectively implemented.

摘要

背景

药物与治疗学委员会(DTCs)需要做出可能会对药物使用的临床和经济结果产生影响的艰难决策。很少有研究调查DTC政策实施的障碍,对于改善这一过程的方法也知之甚少。

目的

这项定性研究的具体目标是探讨利益相关者对于(1)药物与治疗学委员会(DTC)政策实施障碍的看法,以及(2)改善DTC政策实施的方法。

方法

澳大利亚DTC的利益相关者参与了焦点小组讨论。讨论进行了录音并逐字转录。进行了主题内容分析。

结果

进行了六次焦点小组讨论。确定了一些障碍(资源不足、缺乏跟进、缺乏自主权、DTC在组织内的知名度低以及过度依赖药房实施政策)。参与者认为,对决策进行优先排序、优化药房角色、提供实时信息以及积极争取组织承诺是改善DTC政策实施的一些方法。

结论

尽管这项研究是在澳大利亚进行的,但其他国家的DTC面临的挑战可能类似。自主权、社会影响力和资源是澳大利亚和国际上许多DTC实施政策/指南时的重要问题。预计这些问题将对政策实施产生影响。因此,本研究的结果可能具有广泛的适用性。这项工作强化了这样一种观念,即DTC的重要性不仅仅在于决策本身。如果DTC政策没有得到有效实施,投入到决策中的时间和专业知识可能会被削弱。

相似文献

1
Perspectives on Drug and Therapeutics Committee policy implementation.药物与治疗学委员会政策实施的观点。
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2005 Dec;1(4):526-45. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2005.09.001.
2
Drug and therapeutics committees: the relationships among structure, function, and effectiveness.药物与治疗学委员会:结构、功能与有效性之间的关系
Hosp Pharm. 1993 Jun;28(6):492-3, 496-8, 508.
3
Prioritising drug and therapeutics committee (DTC) decisions: a national survey.药物与治疗学委员会(DTC)决策的优先级排序:一项全国性调查。
Pharm World Sci. 2007 Apr;29(2):90-6. doi: 10.1007/s11096-006-9074-y. Epub 2006 Dec 23.
4
Drug and Therapeutics Committees in Australia: expected and actual performance.澳大利亚的药物与治疗委员会:预期表现与实际表现
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1996 Nov;42(5):551-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.1996.tb00048.x.
5
Constraints to microbial food safety policy: opinions from stakeholder groups along the farm to fork continuum.微生物食品安全政策的制约因素:沿农场到餐桌连续统一体各利益相关方群体的意见
Zoonoses Public Health. 2007;54(5):177-84. doi: 10.1111/j.1863-2378.2007.01042.x.
6
Achieving rational therapeutics through consensus-based protocols and follow-up.
Hosp Formul. 1990 Mar;25(3):283-4, 289-94.
7
Drug and therapeutics committees in Danish hospitals: a survey of organization, activities and drug selection procedures.丹麦医院的药物和治疗学委员会:组织、活动和药物选择程序调查。
Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol. 2013 Apr;112(4):264-9. doi: 10.1111/bcpt.12028. Epub 2012 Dec 20.
8
Decision-makers and the usefulness of research evidence in policy implementation--a case study from Lao PDR.决策者与研究证据在政策实施中的效用——来自老挝的个案研究
Soc Sci Med. 2005 Sep;61(6):1291-9. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2005.01.014. Epub 2005 Mar 5.
9
Effective decision-making in a changing healthcare environment: a P & T Committee interview.在不断变化的医疗环境中进行有效决策:药品与治疗学委员会访谈
Hosp Formul. 1989 Feb;24(2):85-7, 90, 93 passim.
10
Inter-role relationships in hospital-based pharmacy and therapeutics committee decision making.医院药学与治疗学委员会决策中的角色间关系
J Health Psychol. 2005 Jan;10(1):45-64. doi: 10.1177/1359105305045347.

引用本文的文献

1
Clinical and conventional pharmacy services in Polish hospitals: a national survey.波兰医院的临床与传统药学服务:一项全国性调查。
Int J Clin Pharm. 2016 Apr;38(2):271-9. doi: 10.1007/s11096-015-0234-9. Epub 2016 Jan 6.
2
Prioritising drug and therapeutics committee (DTC) decisions: a national survey.药物与治疗学委员会(DTC)决策的优先级排序:一项全国性调查。
Pharm World Sci. 2007 Apr;29(2):90-6. doi: 10.1007/s11096-006-9074-y. Epub 2006 Dec 23.