Curry Susan J, Emery Sherry, Sporer Amy K, Mermelstein Robin, Flay Brian R, Berbaum Michael, Warnecke Richard B, Johnson Timothy, Mowery Paul, Parsons Jennifer, Harmon Lori, Hund Lisa, Wells Henry
Institute for Health Research and Policy, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL 60608, USA.
Am J Public Health. 2007 Jan;97(1):171-7. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2005.065268. Epub 2006 Nov 30.
We collected data on a national sample of existing community-based tobacco cessation programs for youths to understand their prevalence and overall characteristics.
We employed a 2-stage sampling design with US counties as the first-stage probability sampling units. We then used snowball sampling in selected counties to identify administrators of tobacco cessation programs for youths. We collected data on cessation programs when programs were identified.
We profiled 591 programs in 408 counties. Programs were more numerous in urban counties; fewer programs were found in low-income counties. State-level measures of smoking prevalence and tobacco control expenditures were not associated with program availability. Most programs were multisession, school-based group programs serving 50 or fewer youths per year. Program content included cognitive-behavioral components found in adult programs along with content specific to adolescence. The median annual budget was 2000 dollars. Few programs (9%) reported only mandatory enrollment, 35% reported mixed mandatory and voluntary enrollment, and 56% reported only voluntary enrollment.
There is considerable homogeneity among community-based tobacco cessation programs for youths. Programs are least prevalent in the types of communities for which national data show increases in youths' smoking prevalence.
我们收集了全国范围内现有针对青少年的社区戒烟项目样本的数据,以了解其普及程度和总体特征。
我们采用两阶段抽样设计,以美国各县作为第一阶段概率抽样单位。然后在选定的县使用滚雪球抽样来确定青少年戒烟项目的管理人员。在确定项目时,我们收集了戒烟项目的数据。
我们对408个县的591个项目进行了描述。城市县的项目更多;低收入县的项目较少。州一级的吸烟流行率和烟草控制支出指标与项目可获得性无关。大多数项目是多阶段、以学校为基础的团体项目,每年服务50名或更少的青少年。项目内容包括成人项目中常见的认知行为成分以及特定于青少年的内容。年度预算中位数为2000美元。很少有项目(9%)报告仅为强制入学,35%报告强制入学和自愿入学混合,56%报告仅为自愿入学。
针对青少年的社区戒烟项目之间存在相当大的同质性。在全国数据显示青少年吸烟率上升的社区类型中,项目最为少见。