Suppr超能文献

衡量基于网络干预措施中的参与者的农村地区属性。

Measuring participant rurality in Web-based interventions.

作者信息

Danaher Brian G, Hart L Gary, McKay H Garth, Severson Herbert H

机构信息

Oregon Research Institute, 1715 Franklin Boulevard, Eugene, OR 97403 USA.

出版信息

BMC Public Health. 2007 Aug 31;7:228. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-7-228.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Web-based health behavior change programs can reach large groups of disparate participants and thus they provide promise of becoming important public health tools. Data on participant rurality can complement other demographic measures to deepen our understanding of the success of these programs. Specifically, analysis of participant rurality can inform recruitment and social marketing efforts, and facilitate the targeting and tailoring of program content. Rurality analysis can also help evaluate the effectiveness of interventions across population groupings.

METHODS

We describe how the RUCAs (Rural-Urban Commuting Area Codes) methodology can be used to examine results from two Randomized Controlled Trials of Web-based tobacco cessation programs: the ChewFree.com project for smokeless tobacco cessation and the Smokers' Health Improvement Program (SHIP) project for smoking cessation.

RESULTS

Using RUCAs methodology helped to highlight the extent to which both Web-based interventions reached a substantial percentage of rural participants. The ChewFree program was found to have more rural participation which is consistent with the greater prevalence of smokeless tobacco use in rural settings as well as ChewFree's multifaceted recruitment program that specifically targeted rural settings.

CONCLUSION

Researchers of Web-based health behavior change programs targeted to the US should routinely include RUCAs as a part of analyzing participant demographics. Researchers in other countries should examine rurality indices germane to their country.

摘要

背景

基于网络的健康行为改变项目能够覆盖大量不同的参与者,因此有望成为重要的公共卫生工具。关于参与者所在农村地区情况的数据可以补充其他人口统计学指标,以加深我们对这些项目成功与否的理解。具体而言,对参与者农村地区情况的分析可以为招募和社会营销工作提供信息,并有助于确定项目内容的目标受众和进行针对性调整。农村地区情况分析还可以帮助评估不同人群分组中干预措施的有效性。

方法

我们描述了如何使用农村城市通勤区代码(RUCAs)方法来检验两项基于网络的戒烟项目随机对照试验的结果:用于无烟烟草戒烟的ChewFree.com项目和用于戒烟的吸烟者健康改善项目(SHIP)。

结果

使用RUCAs方法有助于突出这两项基于网络的干预措施覆盖相当比例农村参与者的程度。研究发现,ChewFree项目的农村参与者更多,这与农村地区无烟烟草使用更为普遍以及ChewFree专门针对农村地区的多方面招募项目相一致。

结论

针对美国的基于网络的健康行为改变项目的研究人员应常规性地将RUCAs纳入参与者人口统计学分析的一部分。其他国家的研究人员应研究与其国家相关的农村地区指标。

相似文献

6
A national survey of tobacco cessation programs for youths.一项针对青少年戒烟项目的全国性调查。
Am J Public Health. 2007 Jan;97(1):171-7. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2005.065268. Epub 2006 Nov 30.

引用本文的文献

4
Internet-based interventions for smoking cessation.基于互联网的戒烟干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Sep 4;9(9):CD007078. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007078.pub5.
5
Barriers to Parent Support for Physical Activity in Appalachia.阿巴拉契亚地区家长对体育活动支持的障碍。
J Phys Act Health. 2016 Oct;13(10):1042-1048. doi: 10.1123/jpah.2015-0474. Epub 2016 Aug 16.
6
Interventions for smokeless tobacco use cessation.无烟烟草使用戒断的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Oct 26;2015(10):CD004306. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004306.pub5.
8
Quality of diabetes mellitus care by rural primary care physicians.农村基层医生对糖尿病的护理质量。
J Rural Health. 2012 Fall;28(4):364-71. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-0361.2012.00410.x. Epub 2012 May 31.

本文引用的文献

7
Prevalence and trends in smoking: a national rural study.吸烟的患病率及趋势:一项全国性农村研究。
J Rural Health. 2006 Spring;22(2):112-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-0361.2006.00018.x.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验