McKee Martin, Edwards Nigel, Atun Rifat
European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, England.
Bull World Health Organ. 2006 Nov;84(11):890-6.
While some forms of public-private partnerships are a feature of hospital construction and operation in all countries with mixed economies, there is increasing interest in a model in which a public authority contracts with a private company to design, build and operate an entire hospital. Drawing on the experience of countries such as Australia, Spain, and the United Kingdom, this paper reviews the experience with variants of this model. Although experience is still very limited and rigorous evaluations lacking, four issues have emerged: cost, quality, flexibility and complexity. New facilities have, in general, been more expensive than they would have been if procured using traditional methods. Compared with the traditional system, new facilities are more likely to be built on time and within budget, but this seems often to be at the expense of compromises on quality. The need to minimize the risk to the parties means that it is very difficult to "future-proof" facilities in a rapidly changing world. Finally, such projects are extremely, and in some cases prohibitively, complex. While it is premature to say whether the problems experienced relate to the underlying model or to their implementation, it does seem that a public-private partnership further complicates the already difficult task of building and operating a hospital.
虽然公私合营的某些形式在所有实行混合经济的国家都是医院建设和运营的一大特色,但人们越来越关注一种模式,即公共机构与私人公司签订合同,由私人公司设计、建造并运营一整所医院。借鉴澳大利亚、西班牙和英国等国的经验,本文回顾了这种模式不同变体的经验。尽管经验仍然非常有限且缺乏严格评估,但已出现了四个问题:成本、质量、灵活性和复杂性。总体而言,新建设施比采用传统方法采购的成本更高。与传统体系相比,新建设施更有可能按时且在预算内建成,但这似乎常常是以牺牲质量为代价。尽量降低各方风险的必要性意味着,在快速变化的世界中很难使设施“适应未来发展”。最后,此类项目极其复杂,在某些情况下甚至复杂到令人望而却步。虽说现在判断所遇到的问题是与基本模式还是与实施有关还为时过早,但公私合营似乎确实使本就困难的医院建设和运营任务更加复杂了。