Parry Christopher M, Ho Vo Anh, Phuong Le Thi, Bay Phan Van Be, Lanh Mai Ngoc, Tung Le Thanh, Tham Nguyen Thi Hong, Wain John, Hien Tran Tinh, Farrar Jeremy J
Oxford University Clinical Research Unit, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2007 Mar;51(3):819-25. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00447-06. Epub 2006 Dec 4.
Isolates of Salmonella enterica serovar Typhi that are multidrug resistant (MDR, resistant to chloramphenicol, ampicillin, and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole) and have reduced susceptibility to fluoroquinolones (nalidixic acid resistant, Na(r)) are common in Asia. The optimum treatment for infections caused by such isolates is not established. This study compared different antimicrobial regimens for the treatment of MDR/Na(r) typhoid fever. Vietnamese children and adults with uncomplicated typhoid fever were entered into an open randomized controlled trial. Ofloxacin (20 mg/kg of body weight/day for 7 days), azithromycin (10 mg/kg/day for 7 days), and ofloxacin (15 mg/kg/day for 7 days) combined with azithromycin (10 mg/kg/day for the first 3 days) were compared. Of the 241 enrolled patients, 187 were eligible for analysis (186 S. enterica serovar Typhi, 1 Salmonella enterica serovar Paratyphi A). Eighty-seven percent (163/187) of the patients were children; of the S. enterica serovar Typhi isolates, 88% (165/187) were MDR and 93% (173/187) were Na(r). The clinical cure rate was 64% (40/63) with ofloxacin, 76% (47/62) with ofloxacin-azithromycin, and 82% (51/62) with azithromycin (P = 0.053). The mean (95% confidence interval [CI]) fever clearance time for patients treated with azithromycin (5.8 days [5.1 to 6.5 days]) was shorter than that for patients treated with ofloxacin-azithromycin (7.1 days [6.2 to 8.1 days]) and ofloxacin (8.2 days [7.2 to 9.2 days]) (P < 0.001). Positive fecal carriage immediately posttreatment was detected in 19.4% (12/62) of patients treated with ofloxacin, 6.5% (4/62) of those treated with the combination, and 1.6% (1/62) of those treated with azithromycin (P = 0.006). Both antibiotics were well tolerated. Uncomplicated typhoid fever due to isolates of MDR S. enterica serovar Typhi with reduced susceptibility to fluoroquinolones (Na(r)) can be successfully treated with a 7-day course of azithromycin.
多重耐药(耐氯霉素、氨苄西林和甲氧苄啶-磺胺甲恶唑)且对氟喹诺酮类药物敏感性降低(耐萘啶酸,Na(r))的伤寒沙门氏菌血清型伤寒菌株在亚洲很常见。由这类菌株引起的感染的最佳治疗方法尚未确定。本研究比较了治疗多重耐药/耐萘啶酸(Na(r))伤寒热的不同抗菌方案。越南患有非复杂性伤寒热的儿童和成人进入一项开放随机对照试验。比较了氧氟沙星(20mg/kg体重/天,共7天)、阿奇霉素(10mg/kg/天,共7天)以及氧氟沙星(15mg/kg/天,共7天)联合阿奇霉素(10mg/kg/天,前3天)的治疗效果。在241名入组患者中,187名符合分析条件(186株伤寒沙门氏菌血清型伤寒菌株,1株甲型副伤寒沙门氏菌)。87%(163/187)的患者为儿童;在伤寒沙门氏菌血清型伤寒菌株中,88%(165/187)为多重耐药,93%(173/187)为耐萘啶酸(Na(r))。氧氟沙星治疗的临床治愈率为64%(40/63),氧氟沙星-阿奇霉素治疗为76%(47/62),阿奇霉素治疗为82%(51/62)(P = 0.053)。阿奇霉素治疗患者的平均(95%置信区间[CI])发热消退时间(5.8天[5.1至6.5天])短于氧氟沙星-阿奇霉素治疗患者(7.1天[6.2至8.1天])和氧氟沙星治疗患者(8.2天[7.2至9.2天])(P < 0.001)。氧氟沙星治疗患者中19.4%(12/62)、联合治疗患者中6.5%(4/62)以及阿奇霉素治疗患者中1.6%(1/62)在治疗后立即检测到粪便携带阳性(P = 0.006)。两种抗生素耐受性均良好。对于由对氟喹诺酮类药物敏感性降低(耐萘啶酸,Na(r))的多重耐药伤寒沙门氏菌血清型伤寒菌株引起的非复杂性伤寒热,7天疗程的阿奇霉素治疗可取得成功。