Robinson June K, Turrisi Rob, Stapleton Jerod
Department of Dermatology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL 60611, USA.
J Am Acad Dermatol. 2007 Mar;56(3):391-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2006.10.028. Epub 2006 Dec 4.
We sought to identify mediating variables that may explain the increased effectiveness of a partner-learning skin self-examination (SSE) skills training program over a solo-learning SSE skills training program in a sample of patients at risk for melanoma.
We conducted a randomized control design with pretest, immediate posttest, and 4-month follow-up measures in a clinical ambulatory care office of a hospital. In all, 130 participants were drawn from a melanoma hospital registry and randomly assigned to a solo-learning control group (n = 65) or a partner-learning group (n = 65). Participants either received the skills training individually in the solo-learning control group or in the partner-learning group in which a partner was actively involved in the training. The intervention consisted of a 10-minute educational presentation and skills training session about the ABCDE rule of early melanoma detection. The main outcome measure was SSE performance as measured by use of a body map. The mediators measured included attitudes toward SSE, self-efficacy/confidence in the ability to effectively perform SSE, comfort with having a partner help with SSE, perceived melanoma/skin cancer risk, concern about developing skin cancer/skin damage, and melanoma/skin cancer knowledge.
Attitudes toward SSE, self-efficacy, comfort with having someone help with SSE, and concern about developing sun-damaged skin were found to be significant mediators.
Study limitations include sample size, the evaluation of short-term program effects, and partner relationship variables that could influence the effectiveness of partner learning.
Involvement of a partner in the SSE skills training was more effective than solo learning because of the changes in the above-mentioned mediators. Future SSE skills training programs could benefit through using approaches that produce changes in key variables such as increasing attitudes toward SSE, increasing self-efficacy beliefs in the ability to perform SSE, and making participants feel confident in their ability to examine their skin.
我们试图确定中介变量,这些变量可能解释在一组有患黑色素瘤风险的患者样本中,伙伴学习皮肤自我检查(SSE)技能培训项目相较于独自学习SSE技能培训项目有效性更高的原因。
我们在一家医院的临床门诊护理办公室进行了一项随机对照设计,包括预测试、即时后测试和4个月的随访测量。总共从黑色素瘤医院登记处抽取了130名参与者,并随机分配到独自学习对照组(n = 65)或伙伴学习组(n = 65)。在独自学习对照组中,参与者单独接受技能培训;在伙伴学习组中,有一名伙伴积极参与培训。干预措施包括一场关于早期黑色素瘤检测ABCDE规则的10分钟教育讲座和技能培训课程。主要结局指标是通过使用身体图谱测量的SSE表现。所测量的中介变量包括对SSE的态度、有效进行SSE的自我效能感/信心、对伙伴协助SSE的舒适度、感知到的黑色素瘤/皮肤癌风险、对患皮肤癌/皮肤损伤的担忧以及黑色素瘤/皮肤癌知识。
对SSE的态度、自我效能感、对有人协助SSE的舒适度以及对出现晒伤皮肤的担忧被发现是显著的中介变量。
研究局限性包括样本量、对短期项目效果的评估以及可能影响伙伴学习有效性的伙伴关系变量。
由于上述中介变量的变化,伙伴参与SSE技能培训比独自学习更有效。未来的SSE技能培训项目可以通过采用能使关键变量产生变化的方法而受益,比如增强对SSE的态度、增强进行SSE能力的自我效能信念,以及让参与者对检查自己皮肤的能力感到自信。