Departments of Critical Care Medicine and Community Health Sciences, O'Brien Institute for Public Health and Hotchkiss Brain Institute, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, 2500 University Drive NW, Calgary, AB, T2N 1N4, Canada.
Department of Critical Care Medicine, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, 2500 University Drive NW, Calgary, AB, T2N 1N4, Canada.
BMC Med. 2018 Jul 12;16(1):105. doi: 10.1186/s12916-018-1097-4.
Caregivers may promote the uptake of science into patient care and the practice of evidence-informed medicine. The purpose of this study was to determine whether caregiver-mediated (non-clinical caregiver-delivered) interventions are effective in improving patient, caregiver, provider, or health system outcomes.
We searched the MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health, and Scopus databases from inception to February 27, 2017. Interventions (with a comparison group) reporting on a quality improvement intervention mediated by a caregiver and directed to a patient, in all ages and patient-care settings, were selected for inclusion. A three-category framework was developed to characterize caregiver-mediated interventions: inform (e.g., provide knowledge), activate (e.g., prompt action), and collaborate (e.g., lead to interaction between caregivers and other groups [e.g., care providers]).
Fifty-six studies met the inclusion criteria, and 64% were randomized controlled trials (RCTs). The most commonly assessed outcomes were patient- (n = 40) and caregiver-oriented (n = 33); few health system- (n = 10) and provider-oriented (n = 2) outcomes were reported. Patient outcomes (e.g., satisfaction) were most improved by caregiver-mediated interventions that provided condition and treatment education (e.g., symptom management information) and practical condition-management support (e.g., practicing medication protocol). Caregiver outcomes (e.g., stress-related/psychiatric outcomes) were most improved by interventions that activated caregiver roles (e.g., monitoring blood glucose) and provided information related to that action (e.g., why and how to monitor). The risk of bias was generally high, and the overall quality of the evidence was low-moderate, based on Grading of Recommendations Assessment Development and Evaluation ratings.
There is a large body of research, including many RCTs, to support the use of caregiver-mediated interventions that inform and activate caregivers to improve patient and caregiver outcomes. Select caregiver-mediated interventions improve patient (inform-activate) and caregiver (inform-activate-collaborate) outcomes and should be considered by all researchers implementing patient- and family-oriented research.
PROSPERO, CRD42016052509 .
护理人员可以促进将科学应用于患者护理和循证医学实践。本研究的目的是确定护理人员介导的(非临床护理人员提供的)干预措施是否能有效改善患者、护理人员、提供者或卫生系统的结果。
我们检索了 MEDLINE、Embase、PsycINFO、护理学和联合健康累积索引以及 Scopus 数据库,检索时间截至 2017 年 2 月 27 日。选择了干预措施(有对照组)的研究,这些研究报告了由护理人员介导并针对患者的质量改进干预措施,所有研究均涉及不同年龄和患者护理环境。我们制定了一个三分类框架来描述护理人员介导的干预措施:告知(例如,提供知识)、激活(例如,提示行动)和协作(例如,导致护理人员与其他群体[例如,护理提供者]之间的互动)。
56 项研究符合纳入标准,其中 64%为随机对照试验(RCT)。评估最多的结果是患者(n=40)和护理人员(n=33);很少有报告卫生系统(n=10)和提供者(n=2)的结果。通过提供疾病和治疗教育(例如,症状管理信息)以及提供实际疾病管理支持(例如,实践药物治疗方案)的护理人员介导的干预措施,患者的结果(例如,满意度)得到了最大的改善。通过激活护理人员角色(例如,监测血糖)并提供与该行动相关的信息(例如,为什么以及如何监测)的干预措施,护理人员的结果(例如,与压力相关的/精神科结果)得到了最大的改善。基于推荐评估、制定与评价分级标准,总体风险偏倚较高,证据质量为低-中度。
有大量的研究,包括许多 RCT,支持使用告知和激活护理人员的护理人员介导的干预措施来改善患者和护理人员的结果。选择的护理人员介导的干预措施可以改善患者(告知-激活)和护理人员(告知-激活-协作)的结果,所有实施以患者和家庭为导向的研究的研究人员都应该考虑这些干预措施。
PROSPERO,CRD42016052509 。