• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

本地和外国狍子猎人的捕猎选择性有所不同:战利品猎手会在合适的地点率先开枪。

Selectivity of harvesting differs between local and foreign roe deer hunters: trophy stalkers have the first shot at the right place.

作者信息

Mysterud Atle, Tryjanowski Piotr, Panek Marek

机构信息

Department of Biology, Centre for Ecological and Evolutionary Synthesis, University of Oslo, PO Box 1066 Blindern, 0316 Oslo, Norway.

出版信息

Biol Lett. 2006 Dec 22;2(4):632-5. doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2006.0533.

DOI:10.1098/rsbl.2006.0533
PMID:17148307
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1833986/
Abstract

Harvesting represents a major source of mortality in many deer populations. The extent to which harvesting is selective for specific traits is important in order to understand contemporary evolutionary processes. In addition, since such data are frequently used in life-history studies, it is important to know the pattern of selectivity as a source of bias. Recently, it was demonstrated that different hunting methods were selected for different weights in red deer (Cervus elaphus), but little insight was offered into why this occurs. In this study, we show that foreign trophy stalkers select for larger antlers when hunting roe deer (Capreolus capreolus) than local hunters, but that close to half of the difference in selectivity was due to foreigners hunting earlier in the season and in locations with larger males. The relationship between antler size and age was nevertheless fairly similar based on whether deer was shot by foreign or local hunters.

摘要

在许多鹿群中,狩猎是造成死亡的主要原因之一。了解狩猎对特定性状的选择程度对于理解当代进化过程至关重要。此外,由于此类数据经常用于生活史研究,了解选择模式作为偏差来源也很重要。最近有研究表明,在马鹿(Cervus elaphus)中,不同的狩猎方法针对不同体重的鹿进行选择,但对于为何会出现这种情况却鲜有深入探讨。在本研究中,我们发现,外国狩猎战利品采集者在猎捕狍(Capreolus capreolus)时比当地猎人更倾向于选择鹿角较大的鹿,但选择性差异中近一半是由于外国人在季节早期以及雄性鹿体型较大的地点进行狩猎。不过,无论鹿是被外国猎人还是当地猎人射杀,鹿角大小与年龄之间的关系都相当相似。

相似文献

1
Selectivity of harvesting differs between local and foreign roe deer hunters: trophy stalkers have the first shot at the right place.本地和外国狍子猎人的捕猎选择性有所不同:战利品猎手会在合适的地点率先开枪。
Biol Lett. 2006 Dec 22;2(4):632-5. doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2006.0533.
2
Getting the timing right: antler growth phenology and sexual selection in a wild red deer population.时机恰当:野生马鹿的角生长物候和性选择。
Oecologia. 2010 Oct;164(2):357-68. doi: 10.1007/s00442-010-1656-7. Epub 2010 May 18.
3
Different hunting strategies select for different weights in red deer.不同的狩猎策略会选择不同体重的马鹿。
Biol Lett. 2005 Sep 22;1(3):353-6. doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2005.0330.
4
Does fluctuating asymmetry of antlers in white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) follow patterns predicted for sexually selected traits?白尾鹿(弗吉尼亚鹿)鹿角的波动不对称性是否符合性选择特征所预测的模式?
Proc Biol Sci. 2001 May 7;268(1470):891-8. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2001.1588.
5
The influence of early-life allocation to antlers on male performance during adulthood: Evidence from contrasted populations of a large herbivore.早期分配到鹿角对雄性成年期表现的影响:来自大型食草动物对比种群的证据。
J Anim Ecol. 2018 Jul;87(4):921-932. doi: 10.1111/1365-2656.12833.
6
Can compensatory culling offset undesirable evolutionary consequences of trophy hunting?补偿性捕杀能否抵消狩猎 trophy 产生的不良进化后果?
J Anim Ecol. 2010 Jan;79(1):148-60. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2656.2009.01621.x. Epub 2009 Oct 14.
7
'Double-head' antlers in red deer Cervus elaphus ssp. in which the antler cores survived the death of the cortex.赤鹿(Cervus elaphus ssp.)中的“双头”鹿茸,其中鹿茸芯在皮层死亡后仍存活。
Funct Dev Morphol. 1994;4(1):3-7.
8
Antlers honestly advertise sperm production and quality.鹿角诚实地宣传精子的产生和质量。
Proc Biol Sci. 2005 Jan 22;272(1559):149-57. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2004.2933.
9
Asymmetry in antler size in roe deer (Capreolus capreolus ): an index of individual and population conditions.
Oecologia. 1998 Aug;116(1-2):1-8. doi: 10.1007/s004420050557.
10
Antler size in red deer: heritability and selection but no evolution.马鹿鹿角大小:具有遗传性且可进行选择,但不存在进化。
Evolution. 2002 Aug;56(8):1683-95. doi: 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2002.tb01480.x.

引用本文的文献

1
A 17-Year Study of the Response of Populations to Different Patterns in Antlerless Proportion of Imposed Culls: Antlerless Culling Reduces Overabundant Deer Population.一项为期17年的关于种群对强制捕杀中无角鹿比例不同模式的反应的研究:无角鹿捕杀可减少鹿群数量过剩的情况。
Biology (Basel). 2022 Nov 3;11(11):1607. doi: 10.3390/biology11111607.
2
The Relationship between Hunting Methods and the Sex, Age and Body Mass of Wild Boar .野猪的捕猎方法与性别、年龄及体重之间的关系
Animals (Basel). 2020 Dec 9;10(12):2345. doi: 10.3390/ani10122345.
3
Relationships of catch-per-unit-effort metrics with abundance vary depending on sampling method and population trajectory.渔获努力量指标与丰度的关系因采样方法和种群轨迹而异。
PLoS One. 2020 May 21;15(5):e0233444. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0233444. eCollection 2020.
4
Contrasting patterns of sexually selected traits in Mediterranean and continental populations of European mouflon.欧洲摩弗伦羊地中海种群和大陆种群中性选择特征的对比模式。
Ecol Evol. 2020 Jan 24;10(4):2085-2092. doi: 10.1002/ece3.6041. eCollection 2020 Feb.
5
Hunter selection for larger and older male bobcats affects annual harvest demography.对体型更大、年龄更大的雄性短尾猫进行捕猎选择会影响年度捕猎种群统计学。
R Soc Open Sci. 2018 Oct 10;5(10):180668. doi: 10.1098/rsos.180668. eCollection 2018 Oct.
6
Effects of environmental and anthropogenic landscape features on mule deer harvest in Nebraska.环境和人为景观特征对内布拉斯加州骡鹿捕猎量的影响。
PeerJ. 2018 Sep 10;6:e5510. doi: 10.7717/peerj.5510. eCollection 2018.
7
Human recreation affects spatio-temporal habitat use patterns in red deer (Cervus elaphus).人类活动影响马鹿(Cervus elaphus)的时空栖息地利用模式。
PLoS One. 2017 May 3;12(5):e0175134. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0175134. eCollection 2017.
8
How constraints affect the hunter's decision to shoot a deer.约束条件如何影响猎人射杀鹿的决策。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016 Dec 13;113(50):14450-14455. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1607685113. Epub 2016 Nov 28.
9
Interaction effects between weather and space use on harvesting effort and patterns in red deer.天气与空间利用对马鹿收获努力和模式的交互作用。
Ecol Evol. 2014 Dec;4(24):4786-97. doi: 10.1002/ece3.1318. Epub 2014 Dec 3.
10
Data from selective harvests underestimate temporal trends in quantitative traits.选择性采伐的数据低估了数量性状的时间趋势。
Biol Lett. 2012 Oct 23;8(5):878-81. doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2011.1207. Epub 2012 May 2.

本文引用的文献

1
Mass- and density-dependent reproductive success and reproductive costs in a capital breeder.一种资本繁殖者中与质量和密度相关的繁殖成功率及繁殖成本
Am Nat. 1998 Sep;152(3):367-79. doi: 10.1086/286175.
2
Different hunting strategies select for different weights in red deer.不同的狩猎策略会选择不同体重的马鹿。
Biol Lett. 2005 Sep 22;1(3):353-6. doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2005.0330.
3
Inter-specific synchrony of two contrasting ungulates: wild boar (Sus scrofa) and roe deer (Capreolus capreolus).两种截然不同的有蹄类动物的种间同步性:野猪(Sus scrofa)和狍(Capreolus capreolus)。
Oecologia. 2007 Mar;151(2):232-9. doi: 10.1007/s00442-006-0584-z. Epub 2006 Nov 11.
4
Undesirable evolutionary consequences of trophy hunting.战利品狩猎的不良进化后果。
Nature. 2003 Dec 11;426(6967):655-8. doi: 10.1038/nature02177.
5
Comparative ungulate dynamics: the devil is in the detail.有蹄类动物动态比较:细节决定成败。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2002 Sep 29;357(1425):1285-98. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2002.1128.