Suppr超能文献

利用行政数据库衡量基于人群的临终关怀质量指标:方法学检验

Towards using administrative databases to measure population-based indicators of quality of end-of-life care: testing the methodology.

作者信息

Grunfeld Eva, Lethbridge Lynn, Dewar Ron, Lawson Beverley, Paszat Lawrence F, Johnston Grace, Burge Frederick, McIntyre Paul, Earle Craig C

机构信息

Cancer Outcomes Research Program, Cancer Care Nova Scotia, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Canada.

出版信息

Palliat Med. 2006 Dec;20(8):769-77. doi: 10.1177/0269216306072553.

Abstract

This study is concerned with methods to measure population-based indicators of quality end-of-life care. Using a retrospective cohort approach, we assessed the feasibility, validity and reliability of using administrative databases to measure quality indicators of end-of-life care in two Canadian provinces. The study sample consisted of all females who died of breast cancer between 1 January 1998 and 31 December 2002, in Nova Scotia or Ontario, Canada. From an initial list of 19 quality indicators selected from the literature, seven were determined to be fully measurable in both provinces. An additional seven indicators in one province and three in the other province were partially measurable. Tests comparing administrative and chart data show a high level of agreement with inter-rater reliability, confirming consistency in the chart abstraction process. Using administrative data is an efficient, population-based method to monitor quality of care which can compliment other methods, such as qualitative and purposefully collected clinical data.

摘要

本研究关注于衡量基于人群的临终关怀质量指标的方法。采用回顾性队列研究方法,我们评估了利用行政数据库来衡量加拿大两个省份临终关怀质量指标的可行性、有效性和可靠性。研究样本包括1998年1月1日至2002年12月31日期间在加拿大新斯科舍省或安大略省死于乳腺癌的所有女性。从文献中选取的19个质量指标的初始列表中,有7个指标被确定在两个省份均可完全测量。一个省份还有另外7个指标,另一个省份有3个指标可部分测量。比较行政数据和病历数据的测试显示,评分者间信度具有高度一致性,证实了病历摘要过程的一致性。使用行政数据是一种基于人群的有效方法,可用于监测护理质量,它可以补充其他方法,如定性和特意收集的临床数据。

相似文献

5
Identifying potential indicators of the quality of end-of-life cancer care from administrative data.
J Clin Oncol. 2003 Mar 15;21(6):1133-8. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2003.03.059.
6
Quality Indicators of End-of-Life Care in Patients With Cancer: What Rate Is Right?
J Oncol Pract. 2015 May;11(3):e279-87. doi: 10.1200/JOP.2015.004416. Epub 2015 Apr 28.
7
Evaluation of Reliability and Correlations of Quality Measures in Cancer Care.
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Mar 1;4(3):e212474. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.2474.

引用本文的文献

6
A multi-stage process to develop quality indicators for community-based palliative care using interRAI data.
PLoS One. 2022 Apr 7;17(4):e0266569. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0266569. eCollection 2022.
8
Inappropriate end-of-life cancer care in a generalist and specialist palliative care model: a nationwide retrospective population-based observational study.
BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2022 May;12(e1):e137-e145. doi: 10.1136/bmjspcare-2020-002302. Epub 2020 Dec 22.
9
Multi-province epidemiological research using linked administrative data: a case study from Canada.
Int J Popul Data Sci. 2018 Sep 21;3(3):443. doi: 10.23889/ijpds.v3i3.443.

本文引用的文献

2
Geographic access to health care for rural Medicare beneficiaries.
J Rural Health. 2006 Spring;22(2):140-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-0361.2006.00022.x.
3
Identification in administrative databases of women dying of breast cancer.
J Clin Oncol. 2006 Feb 20;24(6):856-62. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.02.1790.
4
Looking back from death: the value of retrospective studies of end-of-life care.
J Clin Oncol. 2006 Feb 20;24(6):838-40. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.03.9388.
5
Effective number of subjects and number of raters for inter-rater reliability studies.
Stat Med. 2006 May 15;25(9):1547-60. doi: 10.1002/sim.2294.
8
Resurrecting treatment histories of dead patients: a study design that should be laid to rest.
JAMA. 2004 Dec 8;292(22):2765-70. doi: 10.1001/jama.292.22.2765.
9
Trends in the aggressiveness of cancer care near the end of life.
J Clin Oncol. 2004 Jan 15;22(2):315-21. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2004.08.136.
10
Family physician continuity of care and emergency department use in end-of-life cancer care.
Med Care. 2003 Aug;41(8):992-1001. doi: 10.1097/00005650-200308000-00012.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验