Grunfeld Eva, Lethbridge Lynn, Dewar Ron, Lawson Beverley, Paszat Lawrence F, Johnston Grace, Burge Frederick, McIntyre Paul, Earle Craig C
Cancer Outcomes Research Program, Cancer Care Nova Scotia, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Canada.
Palliat Med. 2006 Dec;20(8):769-77. doi: 10.1177/0269216306072553.
This study is concerned with methods to measure population-based indicators of quality end-of-life care. Using a retrospective cohort approach, we assessed the feasibility, validity and reliability of using administrative databases to measure quality indicators of end-of-life care in two Canadian provinces. The study sample consisted of all females who died of breast cancer between 1 January 1998 and 31 December 2002, in Nova Scotia or Ontario, Canada. From an initial list of 19 quality indicators selected from the literature, seven were determined to be fully measurable in both provinces. An additional seven indicators in one province and three in the other province were partially measurable. Tests comparing administrative and chart data show a high level of agreement with inter-rater reliability, confirming consistency in the chart abstraction process. Using administrative data is an efficient, population-based method to monitor quality of care which can compliment other methods, such as qualitative and purposefully collected clinical data.
本研究关注于衡量基于人群的临终关怀质量指标的方法。采用回顾性队列研究方法,我们评估了利用行政数据库来衡量加拿大两个省份临终关怀质量指标的可行性、有效性和可靠性。研究样本包括1998年1月1日至2002年12月31日期间在加拿大新斯科舍省或安大略省死于乳腺癌的所有女性。从文献中选取的19个质量指标的初始列表中,有7个指标被确定在两个省份均可完全测量。一个省份还有另外7个指标,另一个省份有3个指标可部分测量。比较行政数据和病历数据的测试显示,评分者间信度具有高度一致性,证实了病历摘要过程的一致性。使用行政数据是一种基于人群的有效方法,可用于监测护理质量,它可以补充其他方法,如定性和特意收集的临床数据。