• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在全地区范围内试行的基础培训项目中,探究二年级基础培训医生及其教育督导的观点。

Exploring the views of second-year Foundation Programme doctors and their educational supervisors during a deanery-wide pilot Foundation Programme.

作者信息

O'Brien M, Brown J, Ryland I, Shaw N, Chapman T, Gillies R, Graham D

机构信息

Mersey Deanery, Liverpool, UK.

出版信息

Postgrad Med J. 2006 Dec;82(974):813-6. doi: 10.1136/pgmj.2006.049676.

DOI:10.1136/pgmj.2006.049676
PMID:17148705
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2653929/
Abstract

AIM

To explore the views of second-year Foundation Programme doctors (F2s) and their educational supervisors taking part in a deanery-wide pilot Foundation Programme, in order to gain an understanding of their perceptions of the available learning experiences, support and supervision.

METHODS

20 semi-structured interviews were undertaken with randomly selected F2 doctors and educational supervisors participating in the deanery-wide pilot Foundation Programme.

RESULTS

F2 trainees received appropriate and sufficient support and supervision from a variety of sources during their placements; however, it was believed that additional training of educational supervisors was required. Trainees reported some problems with the perception of the role of an F2; further understanding of the purpose and role of the F2 programme is required at trust level. The portfolio was viewed positively as a record and a learning tool, but was thought to be too bureaucratic. Trainees believed that it was more beneficial to their careers to take part in a foundation programme as opposed to a traditional senior house officer post, but both trainees and educational supervisors expressed some concerns about the generic nature of some skills F2s were expected to acquire.

CONCLUSIONS

This evaluation has highlighted successful aspects of the Foundation Programme, particularly with regard to the level of support and range of experiences provided for trainees. Issues of concern to both trainees and educational supervisors have been identified, which require additional understanding.

摘要

目的

探讨参加全地区基础培训计划试点的二年级基础培训医生(F2)及其教育督导的看法,以了解他们对现有学习经历、支持和督导的认知。

方法

对随机挑选的参加全地区基础培训计划试点的F2医生和教育督导进行了20次半结构化访谈。

结果

F2实习生在实习期间从多种渠道获得了适当且充分的支持和督导;然而,认为需要对教育督导进行额外培训。实习生报告了对F2角色认知方面的一些问题;在信托层面需要进一步了解F2培训计划的目的和作用。档案袋被积极地视为一种记录和学习工具,但被认为过于官僚化。实习生认为参加基础培训计划比传统的高级住院医师岗位对他们的职业发展更有益,但实习生和教育督导都对期望F2掌握的一些技能的通用性表示了一些担忧。

结论

本次评估突出了基础培训计划的成功之处,特别是在为实习生提供的支持水平和经历范围方面。已确定了实习生和教育督导都关心的问题,需要进一步了解。

相似文献

1
Exploring the views of second-year Foundation Programme doctors and their educational supervisors during a deanery-wide pilot Foundation Programme.在全地区范围内试行的基础培训项目中,探究二年级基础培训医生及其教育督导的观点。
Postgrad Med J. 2006 Dec;82(974):813-6. doi: 10.1136/pgmj.2006.049676.
2
Is Foundation training producing competent doctors? What do Foundation trainees, educational supervisors and nurses in Scotland have to say?基础培训能否培养出合格的医生?苏格兰的基础培训生、教育导师和护士有何看法?
Scott Med J. 2011 May;56(2):87-93. doi: 10.1258/smj.2011.011033.
3
Portfolio learning for foundation doctors: early feedback on its use in the clinical workplace.基础医生的组合式学习:关于其在临床工作场所使用情况的早期反馈
Med Educ. 2008 Feb;42(2):214-23. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2007.02960.x.
4
Hospital consultants and workplace based assessments: how foundation doctors view these educational interactions?医院顾问和基于工作场所的评估:基础医生如何看待这些教育互动?
Postgrad Med J. 2012 Mar;88(1037):119-24. doi: 10.1136/postgradmedj-2011-130121. Epub 2012 Jan 13.
5
Educational impact of in-training assessment (ITA) in postgraduate medical education: a qualitative study of an ITA programme in actual practice.住院医师培训考核(ITA)在研究生医学教育中的教育影响:对实际应用中的ITA项目的定性研究
Med Educ. 2004 Jul;38(7):767-77. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2929.2004.01841.x.
6
Workplace-based assessments of junior doctors: do scores predict training difficulties?基于工作场所的对低年资医生的评估:评分是否能预测培训困难?
Med Educ. 2011 Dec;45(12):1190-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2011.04056.x. Epub 2011 Oct 13.
7
Supervisors' views about their trainees and supervision.导师对其学员及指导工作的看法。
Australas Psychiatry. 2007 Aug;15(4):273-5. doi: 10.1080/10398560701441695.
8
Becoming a new doctor: a learning or survival exercise?成为一名新医生:是一次学习经历还是生存考验?
Med Educ. 2007 Jul;41(7):653-60. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2929.2007.02785.x.
9
Time to think? Questionnaire survey of pre-registration house officers' experiences of critical appraisal in the Mersey Deanery.思考时间?对默西地区预注册住院医师批判性评估经历的问卷调查
Med Educ. 2007 May;41(5):487-94. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2929.2007.02727.x.
10
Class half-empty? Pre-registration house officer attendance at weekly teaching sessions: implications for delivering the new Foundation Programme curriculum.杯子半空了?预注册住院医师参加每周教学课程的情况:对实施新的基础培训计划课程的影响。
Med Educ. 2006 Sep;40(9):877-83. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2929.2006.02549.x.

引用本文的文献

1
An evaluation of the current patterns and practices of educational supervision in postgraduate medical education in the UK.对英国研究生医学教育中当前教育督导模式与实践的评估。
Perspect Med Educ. 2016 Aug;5(4):205-14. doi: 10.1007/s40037-016-0280-6. Epub 2016 Aug 3.
2
Academic medicine - revolution, evolution or extinction?学术医学——革命、演进还是消亡?
Ulster Med J. 2014 Sep;83(3):141-5.
3
Confounding factors in using upward feedback to assess the quality of medical training: a systematic review.使用向上反馈评估医学培训质量的混杂因素:一项系统综述
J Educ Eval Health Prof. 2014 Aug 13;11:17. doi: 10.3352/jeehp.2014.11.17. eCollection 2014.

本文引用的文献

1
The Foundation Programme and the emergency department: a review of the curriculum and experience of a UK pilot.基础培训计划与急诊科:英国一项试点项目的课程与经验综述
Emerg Med J. 2006 Mar;23(3):167-71. doi: 10.1136/emj.2005.029892.
2
Developing an education and assessment framework for the Foundation Programme.为基础课程开发教育与评估框架。
Med Educ. 2005 Aug;39(8):841-51. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2929.2005.02236.x.