Laitano R F, Guerra A S, Pimpinella M, Caporali C, Petrucci A
Istituto Nazionale di Metrologia delle Radiazioni Ionizzanti, ENEA Centro Ricerche Casaccia, c.p. 2400 Roma, Italy.
Phys Med Biol. 2006 Dec 21;51(24):6419-36. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/51/24/009. Epub 2006 Nov 27.
The correction for charge recombination was determined for different plane-parallel ionization chambers exposed to clinical electron beams with low and high dose per pulse, respectively. The electron energy was nearly the same (about 7 and 9 MeV) for any of the beams used. Boag's two-voltage analysis (TVA) was used to determine the correction for ion losses, k(s), relevant to each chamber considered. The presence of free electrons in the air of the chamber cavity was accounted for in determining k(s) by TVA. The determination of k(s) was made on the basis of the models for ion recombination proposed in past years by Boag, Hochhäuser and Balk to account for the presence of free electrons. The absorbed dose measurements in both low-dose-per-pulse (less than 0.3 mGy per pulse) and high-dose-per-pulse (20-120 mGy per pulse range) electron beams were compared with ferrous sulphate chemical dosimetry, a method independent of the dose per pulse. The results of the comparison support the conclusion that one of the models is more adequate to correct for ion recombination, even in high-dose-per-pulse conditions, provided that the fraction of free electrons is properly assessed. In this respect the drift velocity and the time constant for attachment of electrons in the air of the chamber cavity are rather critical parameters because of their dependence on chamber dimensions and operational conditions. Finally, a determination of the factor k(s) was also made by zero extrapolation of the 1/Q versus 1/V saturation curves, leading to the conclusion that this method does not provide consistent results in high-dose-per-pulse beams.
分别针对暴露于低剂量和高剂量每脉冲临床电子束下的不同平行板电离室,确定了电荷复合校正。所使用的任何电子束的电子能量几乎相同(约7和9兆电子伏特)。采用博阿格双电压分析(TVA)来确定与所考虑的每个电离室相关的离子损失校正系数k(s)。在通过TVA确定k(s)时,考虑了电离室腔体内空气中自由电子的存在。k(s)的确定是基于博阿格、霍赫豪泽和巴尔克在过去几年中提出的用于解释自由电子存在的离子复合模型。将低剂量每脉冲(每脉冲小于0.3毫戈瑞)和高剂量每脉冲(每脉冲20 - 120毫戈瑞范围)电子束中的吸收剂量测量结果与硫酸亚铁化学剂量测定法进行了比较,硫酸亚铁化学剂量测定法是一种与每脉冲剂量无关的方法。比较结果支持这样的结论:只要能正确评估自由电子的比例,即使在高剂量每脉冲条件下,其中一个模型对于校正离子复合更为适用。在这方面,电离室腔体内空气中电子的漂移速度和附着时间常数是相当关键的参数,因为它们取决于电离室尺寸和运行条件。最后,还通过对1/Q与1/V饱和曲线进行零外推来确定因子k(s),得出该方法在高剂量每脉冲电子束中不能提供一致结果的结论。