Suppr超能文献

氟卡尼与缓释美西律治疗稳定型室性早搏的双盲交叉对照研究

A double-blind crossover comparison of flecainide and slow-release mexiletine in the treatment of stable premature ventricular complexes.

作者信息

Capucci A, Di Pasquale G, Boriani G, Carini G, Balducelli M, Frabetti L, Carozzi A, Finzi A, Pinelli G, Magnani B

机构信息

Institute of Cardiovascular Diseases, University of Bologna, Italy.

出版信息

Int J Clin Pharmacol Res. 1991;11(1):23-33.

PMID:1714885
Abstract

In 24 patients with stable premature ventricular contractions (PVCs) greater than or equal to 100/h, Lown class greater than or equal to 2 the relative anti-arrhythmic efficacy of flecainide 150 mg twice daily and slow-release mexiletine 360 mg twice daily was evaluated in a double-blind placebo-controlled randomized crossover study. All the patients had normal ventricular function. Criteria of efficacy were: reduction greater than or equal to 70% of PVCs or reduction greater than or equal to 50% with abolition of Lown class greater than 2 arrhythmias or suppression of non-sustained ventricular tachycardias (nSVT). Twenty-two patients completed the study protocol. The placebo phases showed comparable results and no carry over effect. The criteria of efficacy were fulfilled in 20 of the 22 patients (91%) on flecainide and in 12 of the 22 (55%) on mexiletine. The absolute reductions of PVCs, couplets and nSVT obtained on flecainide and mexiletine, in comparison to the placebo, were statistically significant (p less than 0.01 for flecainide, p less than 0.05 for mexiletine). Flecainide was superior to mexiletine in overall PVC reduction (p less than 0.05). In the 17 patients with couplets the reduction obtained with flecainide was superior to mexiletine (p less than 0.05). Both drugs were highly effective on nSVT. At steady state, the mean plasma levels of both drugs were within the range of clinical efficacy. The drugs were well tolerated and no patient withdrew because of side-effects. It was concluded that at the dosages employed flecainide was superior to mexiletine in reducing premature ventricular contractions and in abolishing couplets. The efficacy of both drugs for non-sustained ventricular tachycardias was comparable. Both drugs were highly effective by comparison with the placebo.

摘要

在24例频发室性早搏(PVCs)≥100次/小时、洛恩分级≥2级的稳定型患者中,采用双盲安慰剂对照随机交叉研究,评估了每日两次服用150毫克氟卡尼和每日两次服用360毫克缓释美西律的相对抗心律失常疗效。所有患者心室功能正常。疗效标准为:PVCs减少≥70%,或洛恩分级>2级心律失常减少≥50%并消失,或非持续性室性心动过速(nSVT)得到抑制。22例患者完成了研究方案。安慰剂阶段结果相当,且无残留效应。22例服用氟卡尼的患者中有20例(91%)、服用美西律的患者中有12例(55%)达到了疗效标准。与安慰剂相比,服用氟卡尼和美西律后PVCs、成对早搏和nSVT的绝对减少具有统计学意义(氟卡尼p<0.01,美西律p<0.05)。在总体PVC减少方面,氟卡尼优于美西律(p<0.05)。在17例有成对早搏的患者中,氟卡尼的减少效果优于美西律(p<0.05)。两种药物对nSVT均有高效。在稳态时,两种药物的平均血浆水平均在临床疗效范围内。药物耐受性良好,无患者因副作用退出研究。结论是,在所使用的剂量下,氟卡尼在减少室性早搏和消除成对早搏方面优于美西律。两种药物对非持续性室性心动过速的疗效相当。与安慰剂相比,两种药物均有高效。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验