• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

血清神经元特异性烯醇化酶在前列腺癌诊断和监测中的研究:多种肿瘤标志物检测的比较研究

Investigation on serum neurone-specific enolase in prostate cancer diagnosis and monitoring: comparative study of a multiple tumor marker assay.

作者信息

Tarle M, Radoś N

机构信息

Nuclear Medicine and Oncology Clinic, University Hospital Dr. M. Stojanovic, Zagreb, Croatia, Yugoslavia.

出版信息

Prostate. 1991;19(1):23-33. doi: 10.1002/pros.2990190103.

DOI:10.1002/pros.2990190103
PMID:1715080
Abstract

A quadruple tumor marker serotest assay (neurone-specific enolase, NSE, prostate-specific antigen, PSA, prostatic acid phosphatase, PAP, and carcino-embryonic antigen, CEA) was performed on sera from both 63 patients with untreated prostate cancer and 135 patients treated with orchiectomy, flutamide, diethylstilbestrol (DES), cyproterone acetate (CPA), and Estracyt. In untreated patients with local tumor elevated blood NSE concentrations were found more frequently (10/35, 28.6%) than in untreated subjects with disseminated disease (3/28, 10.7%). Elevated NSE values were measured more frequently in nonresponders to therapy 10/46 (21.7%), than in responders during prostate cancer partial remission (2/89, 2.2%). In none of NSE-positive neoplasms a small cell prostate cancer has been histologically detected. Many of NSE-positive tumors are also closely associated with elevated blood CEA values. The applied anticancer drugs were inefficient in the normalization of neither one from the pair of elevated NSE and CEA concentrations (regardless of the numerical values of the other two markers, PSA and PAP), but their values were found to decline occasionally only after surgical treatment. In patients with raised PSA, PAP, and CEA levels but with a normal NSE value, the application of the same treatment strategies was in the most of subjects sufficient to provoke either temporary or even lasting tumor response to therapy. Hence, it appears that the assessment of the NSE serotest, despite its minimal value in the overall tumor staging and monitoring, might furnish the decision-making step related to the treatment of aggressive prostate cancer with an additional and powerful tool.

摘要

对63例未经治疗的前列腺癌患者以及135例接受睾丸切除术、氟他胺、己烯雌酚(DES)、醋酸环丙孕酮(CPA)和依立雄胺治疗的患者的血清进行了四项肿瘤标志物血清检测(神经元特异性烯醇化酶,NSE;前列腺特异性抗原,PSA;前列腺酸性磷酸酶,PAP;癌胚抗原,CEA)。在未经治疗的局部肿瘤患者中,血液NSE浓度升高的情况比未经治疗的播散性疾病患者更常见(10/35,28.6%)。在治疗无反应者中,NSE值升高的情况比前列腺癌部分缓解期的反应者更常见(10/46,21.7%)对(2/89,2.2%)。在NSE阳性肿瘤中,均未通过组织学检测到小细胞前列腺癌。许多NSE阳性肿瘤也与血液CEA值升高密切相关。所应用的抗癌药物对升高的NSE和CEA浓度中的任何一项都无法使其恢复正常(无论其他两项标志物PSA和PAP的数值如何),但仅在手术治疗后偶尔发现其值下降。在PSA、PAP和CEA水平升高但NSE值正常的患者中,大多数患者采用相同的治疗策略足以引发对治疗的暂时甚至持久的肿瘤反应。因此,似乎NSE血清检测的评估,尽管在整体肿瘤分期和监测中的价值极小,但可能为侵袭性前列腺癌的治疗决策提供一个额外且有力的工具。

相似文献

1
Investigation on serum neurone-specific enolase in prostate cancer diagnosis and monitoring: comparative study of a multiple tumor marker assay.血清神经元特异性烯醇化酶在前列腺癌诊断和监测中的研究:多种肿瘤标志物检测的比较研究
Prostate. 1991;19(1):23-33. doi: 10.1002/pros.2990190103.
2
NK cell activity in treated prostate cancer patients as a probe for circulating tumor cells: hormone regulatory effects in vivo.经治疗的前列腺癌患者的自然杀伤细胞活性作为循环肿瘤细胞的检测指标:体内激素调节作用
Prostate. 1992;21(2):111-20. doi: 10.1002/pros.2990210204.
3
Serial measurements of tissue polypeptide specific antigen (TPS), PSA, PAP and CEA serotest values in treated patients with primary and metastatic prostate cancer.对原发性和转移性前列腺癌患者进行治疗后,连续测量组织多肽特异性抗原(TPS)、前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)、前列腺酸性磷酸酶(PAP)和癌胚抗原(CEA)的血清检测值。
Anticancer Res. 1993 May-Jun;13(3):769-77.
4
A more objective staging of advanced prostate cancer--routine recognition of malignant endocrine structures: the assessment of serum TPS, PSA, and NSE values.晚期前列腺癌更客观的分期——恶性内分泌结构的常规识别:血清TPS、PSA和NSE值的评估
Prostate. 1994;24(3):143-8. doi: 10.1002/pros.2990240308.
5
Tumor markers in patients with chronic renal failure.慢性肾衰竭患者的肿瘤标志物
Int J Biol Markers. 1990 Apr-Jun;5(2):85-8.
6
Neuroendocrine differentiation in carcinomas of the prostate: do neuroendocrine serum markers reflect immunohistochemical findings?前列腺癌中的神经内分泌分化:神经内分泌血清标志物能否反映免疫组化结果?
Prostate. 1997 Jan 1;30(1):1-6. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0045(19970101)30:1<1::aid-pros1>3.0.co;2-t.
7
Serum chromogranin-A in advanced prostate cancer.
BJU Int. 2001 Nov;88(7):790-6. doi: 10.1046/j.1464-4096.2001.001223.x.
8
Pretreatment serum level of neuron specific enolase (NSE) as a prognostic factor in metastatic prostate cancer patients treated with endocrine therapy.
Eur Urol. 2003 Sep;44(3):309-14; discussion 314. doi: 10.1016/s0302-2838(03)00303-8.
9
Prognostic value of neuroendocrine serum markers and PSA in irradiated patients with pN0 localized prostate cancer.神经内分泌血清标志物和前列腺特异性抗原在接受放疗的pN0期局限性前列腺癌患者中的预后价值
Prostate. 2001 Feb 1;46(2):126-33. doi: 10.1002/1097-0045(20010201)46:2<126::aid-pros1016>3.0.co;2-7.
10
Chromogranin A and neurone-specific enolase variations during the first 3 months of abiraterone therapy predict outcomes in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer.阿比特龙治疗前3个月期间嗜铬粒蛋白A和神经元特异性烯醇化酶的变化可预测转移性去势抵抗性前列腺癌患者的预后。
BJU Int. 2017 Aug;120(2):226-232. doi: 10.1111/bju.13781. Epub 2017 Feb 19.

引用本文的文献

1
Metastatic prostate cancer with normal level of serum prostate-specific antigen.血清前列腺特异性抗原水平正常的转移性前列腺癌
Int Urol Nephrol. 2003;35(2):189-92. doi: 10.1023/b:urol.0000020306.08275.49.
2
Serum chromogranin A: early detection of hormonal resistance in prostate cancer patients.血清嗜铬粒蛋白A:前列腺癌患者激素抵抗的早期检测
J Clin Lab Anal. 1998;12(1):20-5. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1098-2825(1998)12:1<20::aid-jcla4>3.0.co;2-n.
3
Neuroendocrine cells in the normal, hyperplastic and neoplastic prostate.正常、增生及肿瘤性前列腺中的神经内分泌细胞。
Urol Res. 1995;22(6):333-41. doi: 10.1007/BF00296871.
4
Serum TPS, PSA, and PAP values in relapsing stage D2 adenocarcinoma of the prostate.
Urol Res. 1994;22(5):329-32. doi: 10.1007/BF00297204.