Kwon Bae Ju, Han Moon Hee, Kang Hyun-Seung, Jung Cheolkyu
Department of Radiology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, 28 Yongon-Dong, Seoul 110-744, Korea.
J Endovasc Ther. 2006 Dec;13(6):711-22. doi: 10.1583/06-1900.1.
To report the complications, rescue procedures, and consequences related to the use of an embolus protection filter during carotid artery stenting (CAS).
A retrospective review was undertaken of 72 patients (58 men; mean age 70.0+/-8.2 years, range 56-87) with extracranial atherosclerotic carotid stenosis who underwent 77 CAS procedures under filter protection. Filter-related events and rescue procedures according to each procedural step were retrospectively evaluated on CAS angiograms. In addition, neurological events and outcomes were also assessed.
CAS using a filter was successful in 99% of cases, and the overall rate of minor stroke (n=1), major stroke (0), or mortality (n=1) was 2.6% at 30 days. Filter placement was successful in all cases. However, arterial tortuosity made it difficult for a filter to pass through the stenosis in 1 case; this was overcome with an additional supportive wire (0.018-inch). Filter-related events were flow impairment in 6 (7.8%), filter wedging in the catheter tip in 4 (5.2%), vasospasm >50% narrowing in 7 (9.1%), filling defects within the filter membrane in 5 (6.5%), retrieval failure with the provided retriever in 3 (3.9%), and insecure retrieval without filter collapse in 2 (2.6%). Flow impairment caused drowsy mentality and impaired verbal response in 4, which resolved after prompt filter retrieval. All the cases of filter wedging were resolved with a catheter pulled down into the stented segment to separate the filter element from the catheter tip. Significant vasospasm and filling defects were spontaneously resolved in all cases after filter retrieval. Inability to pass a retriever catheter through a stent was overcome with curved 5-F catheter manipulation in all 3 cases.
The use of a filter during CAS may induce various angiographic or technical events at each step. For a severely stenotic and tortuous carotid lesion with difficult access, a filter may become trapped or irretrievable during flow arrest. Physicians should be aware of the preventive and rescue maneuvers to counter filter-related events, perhaps even considering another type of protection mechanism or carotid endarterectomy.
报告在颈动脉支架置入术(CAS)期间使用栓子保护过滤器相关的并发症、抢救程序及后果。
对72例(58例男性;平均年龄70.0±8.2岁,范围56 - 87岁)患有颅外动脉粥样硬化性颈动脉狭窄并在过滤器保护下接受77次CAS手术的患者进行回顾性研究。根据每个手术步骤,在CAS血管造影上对与过滤器相关的事件和抢救程序进行回顾性评估。此外,还评估了神经学事件和结果。
使用过滤器的CAS在99%的病例中成功,30天时轻微卒中(n = 1)、严重卒中(0)或死亡率(n = 1)的总体发生率为2.6%。所有病例中过滤器放置均成功。然而,1例因动脉迂曲导致过滤器难以通过狭窄部位;通过额外的支撑导丝(0.018英寸)解决了该问题。与过滤器相关的事件包括6例(7.8%)血流受损、4例(5.2%)过滤器楔入导管尖端、7例(9.1%)血管痉挛致狭窄>50%、5例(6.5%)过滤器膜内充盈缺损、3例(3.9%)使用提供的回收器回收失败以及2例(2.6%)回收不安全且过滤器未塌陷。血流受损导致4例出现嗜睡和言语反应受损,在迅速取出过滤器后症状缓解。所有过滤器楔入病例均通过将导管向下拉至支架置入段以将过滤器元件与导管尖端分离得以解决。取出过滤器后,所有病例中的严重血管痉挛和充盈缺损均自行缓解。所有3例无法通过回收导管穿过支架的情况均通过使用弯曲的5-F导管操作得以克服。
在CAS期间使用过滤器可能在每个步骤引发各种血管造影或技术事件。对于严重狭窄且迂曲、难以操作的颈动脉病变,在血流停滞期间过滤器可能会被困住或无法回收。医生应了解应对与过滤器相关事件的预防和抢救措施,甚至可能需要考虑另一种保护机制或颈动脉内膜切除术。